Heyse Thomas J, Stiehl James B, Tibesku Carsten O
Department of Orthopedics and Rheumatology, University Hospital Marburg, Baldingerstrasse, 35037 Marburg, Germany.
Department of Surgery, St Mary's Hospital, 1054 Martin Luther King Drive, Centralia, IL 62801, USA.
Knee. 2015 Dec;22(6):604-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
Correct rotational alignment of components is crucial for the success of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Defining landmarks on the tibia that allow for reproducible measurement of component rotation seems to be more challenging than on the femoral side. This study compares the reproducibility of three different measurement techniques.
A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis of 55 patients following TKA was conducted. The rotation of the tibial components was determined using three different reference lines: a tangent to the posterior tibial margin, the tibial epicondylar axis, and the tibial tubercle. Data were analyzed for intra- and inter-observer reliability using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), and a variance comparison between measurement techniques via F-test.
Highest reliability and lowest variances for measurement of tibial component rotation were achieved by relation to the tibial epicondylar axis and posterior tibial margin. The tibial tubercle proved to be less reliable (ICC 0.632 (interobserver) and 0.526 (intraobserver)), and variances were significantly higher in comparison with the other two techniques.
Based on the presented MRI data, measurements of the tibial component rotation are done best using the posterior tibial margin and the tibial epicondylar axis. The tibial tubercle measurement proved to be less reliable for this purpose. We suggest that all three reference lines will be used for assessment of a painful knee following TKA to allow for informed decision making and for choice of best treatment options for the patient.
组件的正确旋转对线对于全膝关节置换术(TKA)的成功至关重要。确定胫骨上能够实现组件旋转可重复测量的标志点似乎比在股骨侧更具挑战性。本研究比较了三种不同测量技术的可重复性。
对55例TKA术后患者进行了磁共振成像(MRI)分析。使用三条不同的参考线确定胫骨组件的旋转:胫骨后缘切线、胫骨髁上轴和胫骨结节。使用组内相关系数(ICC)分析数据的观察者内和观察者间可靠性,并通过F检验比较测量技术之间的方差。
与胫骨髁上轴和胫骨后缘相关的胫骨组件旋转测量具有最高的可靠性和最低的方差。胫骨结节的可靠性较低(观察者间ICC为0.632,观察者内ICC为0.526),与其他两种技术相比,方差显著更高。
基于所呈现的MRI数据,使用胫骨后缘和胫骨髁上轴进行胫骨组件旋转测量效果最佳。为此,胫骨结节测量的可靠性较低。我们建议,在TKA术后评估疼痛膝关节时,所有三条参考线都应使用,以便做出明智的决策并为患者选择最佳治疗方案。