Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Carretera Canyet s/n, 08916, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Surgery, Faculty of medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Campus UAB, 08913, Bellaterra, Spain.
J Orthop Traumatol. 2023 Aug 3;24(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00718-2.
The optimal total knee arthroplasty (TKA) rotational alignment and how best to obtain and measure it are debatable. The aim was to analyse the reliability of the Berger femoral, three different tibial and four different combined two-dimensional computer tomography (2D-CT) TKA component rotation measurements, and to ascertain which rotational values best predict a successful clinical outcome.
The 2D-CT scans were obtained post-operatively on 60 patients who had TKA. We determined one femoral [Berger's femoral angle (BFA)], three tibial [Berger's tibial angle (BTA), anatomical tibial angle (ATA) and bimalleolar posterior tibial component angle (BM_PTCA)] and four combined [transepicondylar posterior tibial component angle (TE_PTCA), bicondylar posterior tibial component angle (BC_PTCA, transepicondylar bimalleolar angle (TE_BM) and bicondylar bimalleolar angle (BC_BM)] TKA rotation angles. We made all measures in 23 patients twice by three observers and determined inter- and intra-observer agreement using the Bland-Altman plot method. We analysed measures of 55 patients using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis to ascertain the discriminative capacity of BFA, ATA, TE_PTCA and BC_PTCA for predicting a successful clinical outcome according to the Knee Society Score (KSS) threshold.
ATA showed the smaller inter- and intra-observer average of differences (-0.1° and 1.6°, respectively) of the studied methods followed by BFA (-0.9° and 1.4°), TE_PTCA (-2.1° and 2.7°) and BC_PTCA (-0.5° and 1.8°). BFA (-4° to 2.1° and -6.1° to 8.8°) and BC_PTCA (-4.4° to 3.4° and -7.9° to 4.4°) showed the narrower inter- and intra-observer limits of agreement. A TKA device rotation (BC_PTCA) < 0.8° of external rotation (ER) predicted a KSS and KSS knee successful outcome, and < 3.8° ER for KSS functional (AUC = 0.889; 0.907 and 0.764, respectively). BFA and ATA < 0.9° ER and < 3.9° internal rotation (IR) predicted a successful KSS knee outcome (AUC = 0.796 and 0.889, respectively).
The ATA tibial component rotation measurement was the most reliable of those studied. BFA, TE_PTCA and BC_PTCA were reliable measures for TKA femoral and combined rotation. The presence of a minimal rotation between the TKA components (BC_PTCA) and a small femoral ER or tibial IR predicted a successful KSS outcome.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)的最佳旋转对线以及如何最好地获取和测量旋转对线仍存在争议。本研究旨在分析 Berger 股骨、三种不同胫骨和四种不同组合二维计算机断层扫描(2D-CT)TKA 组件旋转测量的可靠性,并确定哪些旋转值能最好地预测临床成功。
对 60 例接受 TKA 的患者术后进行 2D-CT 扫描。我们确定了一个股骨 [Berger 股骨角(BFA)]、三个胫骨 [Berger 胫骨角(BTA)、解剖胫骨角(ATA)和双踝后胫骨组件角(BM_PTCA)] 和四个组合 [髁间后胫骨组件角(TE_PTCA)、双髁后胫骨组件角(BC_PTCA)、髁间双踝角(TE_BM)和双髁双踝角(BC_BM)] TKA 旋转角度。我们由三位观察者在 23 例患者中进行了两次所有测量,并使用 Bland-Altman 图法确定了组内和组间一致性。我们使用 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分析对 55 例患者的测量值进行分析,以确定 BFA、ATA、TE_PTCA 和 BC_PTCA 根据膝关节协会评分(KSS)阈值预测临床成功的能力。
ATA 显示出研究方法中组内和组间平均差异最小(分别为-0.1°和 1.6°),其次是 BFA(-0.9°和 1.4°)、TE_PTCA(-2.1°和 2.7°)和 BC_PTCA(-0.5°和 1.8°)。BFA(-4°至 2.1°和-6.1°至 8.8°)和 BC_PTCA(-4.4°至 3.4°和-7.9°至 4.4°)显示出更窄的组内和组间一致性界限。TKA 装置旋转(BC_PTCA)<0.8°外旋(ER)预测 KSS 和 KSS 膝关节成功结果,<3.8° ER 预测 KSS 功能(AUC=0.889;0.907 和 0.764)。BFA 和 ATA<0.9° ER 和<3.9°内旋(IR)预测 KSS 膝关节成功结果(AUC=0.796 和 0.889)。
研究中,ATA 胫骨组件旋转测量最可靠。BFA、TE_PTCA 和 BC_PTCA 是 TKA 股骨和组合旋转的可靠测量方法。TKA 组件之间存在最小的旋转(BC_PTCA)和较小的股骨 ER 或胫骨 IR 预测 KSS 结果良好。