Petrova Dafina, Garcia-Retamero Rocio, Cokely Edward T
Mind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Granada, Spain (DP, RGR)
Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA (DP, RGR, ETC)
Med Decis Making. 2015 Oct;35(7):847-58. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15587676. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
Decisions about cancer screenings often involve the consideration of complex and counterintuitive evidence. We investigated psychological factors that promote the comprehension of benefits and harms associated with common cancer screenings and their influence on shared decision making.
In experiment 1, 256 men received information about PSA-based prostate cancer screening. In experiment 2, 355 women received information about mammography-based breast cancer screening. In both studies, information about potential screening outcomes was provided in 1 of 3 formats: text, a fact box, or a visual aid (e.g., mortality with and without screening and rate of overdiagnosis). We modeled the interplay of comprehension, perceived risks and benefits, intention to participate in screening, and desire for shared decision making.
Generally, visual aids were the most effective format, increasing comprehension by up to 18%. Improved comprehension was associated with 1) superior decision making (e.g., fewer intentions to participate in screening when it offered no benefit) and 2) more desire to share in decision making. However, comprehension of the evidence had a limited effect on experienced emotions, risk perceptions, and decision making among those participants who felt that the consequences of cancer were extremely severe.
Even when information is counterintuitive and requires the integration of complex harms and benefits, user-friendly risk communications can facilitate comprehension, improve high-stakes decisions, and promote shared decision making. However, previous beliefs about the effectiveness of screening or strong fears about specific cancers may interfere with comprehension and informed decision making.
关于癌症筛查的决策通常需要考虑复杂且有违直觉的证据。我们调查了促进对常见癌症筛查相关益处和危害理解的心理因素及其对共同决策的影响。
在实验1中,256名男性收到了基于前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)的前列腺癌筛查信息。在实验2中,355名女性收到了基于乳腺X线摄影的乳腺癌筛查信息。在两项研究中,关于潜在筛查结果的信息以三种格式之一提供:文本、事实框或视觉辅助工具(例如,筛查和未筛查的死亡率以及过度诊断率)。我们对理解、感知风险和益处、参与筛查的意愿以及共同决策的愿望之间的相互作用进行了建模。
一般来说,视觉辅助工具是最有效的形式,可将理解程度提高多达18%。理解的提高与以下两点相关:1)更好的决策(例如,当筛查没有益处时,参与筛查的意愿降低);2)更希望参与共同决策。然而,对于那些认为癌症后果极其严重的参与者来说,对证据的理解对体验到的情绪、风险认知和决策的影响有限。
即使信息有违直觉且需要综合复杂的危害和益处,用户友好的风险沟通也可以促进理解、改善重大决策并促进共同决策。然而,先前对筛查有效性的信念或对特定癌症的强烈恐惧可能会干扰理解和明智决策。