Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Am J Hematol. 2015 Sep;90(9):778-83. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24082.
Gray zone lymphoma (GZL) with features between classical Hodgkin lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a recently recognized entity reported to present primarily with mediastinal disease (MGZL). We examined detailed clinical features, outcomes, and prognostic factors among 112 GZL patients recently treated across 19 North American centers. Forty-three percent of patients presented with MGZL, whereas 57% had non-MGZL (NMGZL). NMGZL patients were older (50 versus 37 years, P = 0.0001); more often had bone marrow involvement (19% versus 0%, P = 0.001); >1 extranodal site (27% versus 8%, P = 0.014); and advanced stage disease (81% versus 13%, P = 0.0001); but they had less bulk (8% versus 44%, P = 0.0001), compared with MGZL patients. Common frontline treatments were cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisone +/- rituximab (CHOP+/-R) 46%, doxorubicin-bleomycin-vinblastine-dacarbazine +/- rituximab (ABVD+/-R) 30%, and dose-adjusted etoposide-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-vincristine-prednisone-rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R) 10%. Overall and complete response rates for all patients were 71% and 59%, respectively; 33% had primary refractory disease. At 31-month median follow-up, 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival rates were 40% and 88%, respectively. Interestingly, outcomes in MGZL patients seemed similar compared with that of NMGZL patients. On multivariable analyses, performance status and stage were highly prognostic for survival for all patients. Additionally, patients treated with ABVD+/-R had markedly inferior 2-year PFS (22% versus 52%, P = 0.03) compared with DLBCL-directed therapy (CHOP+/-R and DA-EPOCH-R), which persisted on Cox regression (hazard ratio, 1.88; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-3.83; P = 0.04). Furthermore, rituximab was associated with improved PFS on multivariable analyses (hazard ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.69; P = 0.002). Collectively, GZL is a heterogeneous and likely more common entity and often with nonmediastinal presentation, whereas outcomes seem superior when treated with a rituximab-based, DLBCL-specific regimen.
灰色区淋巴瘤(GZL)具有介于经典霍奇金淋巴瘤和弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)之间的特征,是最近被认识到的一种实体瘤,主要表现为纵隔疾病(MGZL)。我们检查了最近在 19 个北美中心接受治疗的 112 名 GZL 患者的详细临床特征、结局和预后因素。43%的患者表现为 MGZL,而 57%的患者为非 MGZL(NMGZL)。NMGZL 患者年龄较大(50 岁与 37 岁,P=0.0001);骨髓受累更常见(19%与 0%,P=0.001);>1 个结外部位(27%与 8%,P=0.014);疾病分期更晚(81%与 13%,P=0.0001);但肿块更大(8%与 44%,P=0.0001),与 MGZL 患者相比。常见的一线治疗方案是环磷酰胺-多柔比星-长春新碱-泼尼松 +/-利妥昔单抗(CHOP+/-R)46%、多柔比星-博来霉素-长春新碱-达卡巴嗪 +/-利妥昔单抗(ABVD+/-R)30%和剂量调整的依托泊苷-多柔比星-环磷酰胺-长春新碱-泼尼松-利妥昔单抗(DA-EPOCH-R)10%。所有患者的总缓解率和完全缓解率分别为 71%和 59%;33%的患者存在原发性难治性疾病。在 31 个月的中位随访中,2 年无进展生存率(PFS)和总生存率分别为 40%和 88%。有趣的是,MGZL 患者的结局似乎与 NMGZL 患者相似。多变量分析显示,所有患者的体能状态和分期对生存具有高度预后意义。此外,接受 ABVD+/-R 治疗的患者 2 年 PFS 明显较差(22%与 52%,P=0.03),低于接受 DLBCL 靶向治疗(CHOP+/-R 和 DA-EPOCH-R)的患者,这一结果在 Cox 回归分析中仍然存在(风险比,1.88;95%置信区间,1.03-3.83;P=0.04)。此外,多变量分析显示利妥昔单抗与 PFS 改善相关(风险比,0.35;95%置信区间,0.18-0.69;P=0.002)。综上所述,GZL 是一种异质性的、可能更为常见的实体瘤,常表现为非纵隔疾病,而当采用利妥昔单抗为基础的、针对 DLBCL 的治疗方案时,其结局似乎更好。