Ventham Nicholas T, Kennedy Ewan D, Brady Richard R, Paterson Hugh M, Speake Doug, Foo Irwin, Fearon Kenneth C H
Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK,
World J Surg. 2015 Sep;39(9):2220-34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3105-6.
Intravenous (IV) lidocaine has analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of IV lidocaine in controlling postoperative pain following laparoscopic surgery.
A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IV lidocaine versus placebo/routine treatment for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic surgery. The primary outcome was opiate requirement at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included cumulative opiate requirement, numerical pain scores (2, 12, 24, 48 h at rest and on movement), recovery indices (nausea and vomiting, length of stay, time until diet resumption, first flatus and bowel movement) and side effects (cardiac/neurological toxicity). Subgroup analyses were performed according to operation type and to compare IV lidocaine with intraperitoneal lidocaine.
Fourteen RCTs with 742 patients were included. IV lidocaine was associated with a small but significant reduction in opiate requirement at 24 h compared with placebo/routine care. IV lidocaine was associated with reduced cumulative opiate requirement, reduced pain scores at rest at 2, 12 and 24 h, reduced nausea and vomiting and a shorter time until resumption of diet. The length of stay did not differ between groups. There was a low incidence of IV lidocaine-associated toxicity. In subgroup analyses, there was no difference between IV and intraperitoneal lidocaine in the measured outcomes.
IV lidocaine has a multidimensional effect on the quality of recovery. IV lidocaine was associated with lower opiate requirements, reduced nausea and vomiting and a shorter time until resumption of diet. Whilst IV lidocaine appears safe, the optimal treatment regimen remains unknown. Statistical heterogeneity was high.
静脉注射利多卡因具有镇痛和抗炎特性。本研究旨在评估静脉注射利多卡因在控制腹腔镜手术后疼痛方面的疗效。
对比较静脉注射利多卡因与安慰剂/常规治疗用于腹腔镜手术后镇痛的随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析。主要结局是术后24小时的阿片类药物需求量。次要结局包括累计阿片类药物需求量、数字疼痛评分(静息和活动时2、12、24、48小时)、恢复指标(恶心和呕吐、住院时间、恢复饮食时间、首次排气和排便时间)以及副作用(心脏/神经毒性)。根据手术类型进行亚组分析,并比较静脉注射利多卡因与腹腔内注射利多卡因。
纳入了14项RCT,共742例患者。与安慰剂/常规护理相比,静脉注射利多卡因在术后24小时的阿片类药物需求量有小幅但显著的降低。静脉注射利多卡因与累计阿片类药物需求量减少、静息时2、12和24小时疼痛评分降低、恶心和呕吐减少以及恢复饮食时间缩短相关。两组之间住院时间无差异。静脉注射利多卡因相关毒性的发生率较低。在亚组分析中,静脉注射和腹腔内注射利多卡因在测量结局方面无差异。
静脉注射利多卡因对恢复质量有多方面影响。静脉注射利多卡因与较低的阿片类药物需求量、减少的恶心和呕吐以及缩短的恢复饮食时间相关。虽然静脉注射利多卡因似乎安全,但最佳治疗方案仍未知。统计异质性较高。