Suppr超能文献

近期缺血性卒中患者按病前风险水平分组的最佳联合治疗与血管结局

Optimal combination treatment and vascular outcomes in recent ischemic stroke patients by premorbid risk level.

作者信息

Park Jong-Ho, Ovbiagele Bruce

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Seonam University Myongji Hospital, Goyang, South Korea; Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.

Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.

出版信息

J Neurol Sci. 2015 Aug 15;355(1-2):90-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.05.028. Epub 2015 May 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Optimal combination of secondary stroke prevention treatment including antihypertensives, antithrombotic agents, and lipid modifiers is associated with reduced recurrent vascular risk including stroke. It is unclear whether optimal combination treatment has a differential impact on stroke patients based on level of vascular risk.

METHODS

We analyzed a clinical trial dataset comprising 3680 recent non-cardioembolic stroke patients aged ≥35 years and followed for 2 years. Patients were categorized by appropriateness levels 0 to III depending on the number of the drugs prescribed divided by the number of drugs potentially indicated for each patient (0=none of the indicated medications prescribed and III=all indicated medications prescribed [optimal combination treatment]). High-risk was defined as having a history of stroke or coronary heart disease (CHD) prior to the index stroke event. Independent associations of medication appropriateness level with a major vascular event (stroke, CHD, or vascular death), ischemic stroke, and all-cause death were analyzed.

RESULTS

Compared with level 0, for major vascular events, the HR of level III in the low-risk group was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.20-1.28) and 0.32 (0.14-0.70) in the high-risk group; for stroke, the HR of level III in the low-risk group was 0.54 (0.16-1.77) and 0.25 (0.08-0.85) in the high-risk group; and for all-cause death, the HR of level III in the low-risk group was 0.66 (0.09-5.00) and 0.22 (0.06-0.78) in the high-risk group.

CONCLUSION

Optimal combination treatment is related to a significantly lower risk of future vascular events and death among high-risk patients after a recent non-cardioembolic stroke.

摘要

背景

包括抗高血压药、抗血栓形成药和调脂药在内的二级卒中预防治疗的最佳组合与降低包括卒中在内的复发性血管风险相关。尚不清楚最佳组合治疗对基于血管风险水平的卒中患者是否有不同影响。

方法

我们分析了一个临床试验数据集,该数据集包含3680名年龄≥35岁的近期非心源性卒中患者,并随访了2年。根据所开药物数量除以每个患者可能需要的药物数量,将患者分为0至III级合适程度(0 =未开任何指定药物,III =开了所有指定药物[最佳组合治疗])。高危定义为在首次卒中事件之前有卒中或冠心病(CHD)病史。分析了药物合适程度与主要血管事件(卒中、冠心病或血管性死亡)、缺血性卒中和全因死亡的独立关联。

结果

与0级相比,对于主要血管事件,低风险组中III级的风险比(HR)为0.51(95%置信区间:0.20 - 1.28),高风险组中为0.32(0.14 - 0.70);对于卒中,低风险组中III级的HR为0.54(0.16 - 1.77),高风险组中为0.25(0.08 - 0.85);对于全因死亡,低风险组中III级的HR为0.66(0.09 - 5.00),高风险组中为0.22(0.06 - 0.78)。

结论

最佳组合治疗与近期非心源性卒中后高危患者未来血管事件和死亡风险显著降低相关。

相似文献

1
Optimal combination treatment and vascular outcomes in recent ischemic stroke patients by premorbid risk level.
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Aug 15;355(1-2):90-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.05.028. Epub 2015 May 28.
2
Optimal combination secondary prevention drug treatment and stroke outcomes.
Neurology. 2015 Jan 6;84(1):50-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001099. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
3
Secondary prevention in patients with vascular disease. A population based study on the underuse of recommended medications.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;84(3):348-53. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2012-303267. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
6
Vascular events, mortality, and preventive therapy following ischemic stroke in the elderly.
Neurology. 2005 Sep 27;65(6):835-42. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000176058.09848.bb.
7
Prior events predict cerebrovascular and coronary outcomes in the PROGRESS trial.
Stroke. 2006 Jun;37(6):1497-502. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000221212.36860.c9. Epub 2006 Apr 20.
8
Disparities between prescribing of secondary prevention therapies for stroke and coronary artery disease in general practice.
Int J Stroke. 2012 Dec;7(8):649-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2011.00613.x. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
9
Predictive impact of daily physical activity on new vascular events in patients with mild ischemic stroke.
Int J Stroke. 2015 Feb;10(2):219-23. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12392. Epub 2014 Nov 9.
10
Ischemic stroke in patients receiving aspirin.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2012 Nov;21(8):868-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.05.009. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

本文引用的文献

2
Optimal combination secondary prevention drug treatment and stroke outcomes.
Neurology. 2015 Jan 6;84(1):50-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001099. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
6
Factors influencing the decline in stroke mortality: a statement from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.
Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):315-53. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000437068.30550.cf. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
8
9
Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke.
N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 18;359(12):1238-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805002. Epub 2008 Aug 27.
10
Impact of combination evidence-based medical therapy on mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes.
Circulation. 2004 Feb 17;109(6):745-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000112577.69066.CB.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验