Park Jong-Ho, Ovbiagele Bruce
Department of Neurology, Seonam University Myongji Hospital, Goyang, South Korea; Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
Department of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
J Neurol Sci. 2015 Aug 15;355(1-2):90-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.05.028. Epub 2015 May 28.
Optimal combination of secondary stroke prevention treatment including antihypertensives, antithrombotic agents, and lipid modifiers is associated with reduced recurrent vascular risk including stroke. It is unclear whether optimal combination treatment has a differential impact on stroke patients based on level of vascular risk.
We analyzed a clinical trial dataset comprising 3680 recent non-cardioembolic stroke patients aged ≥35 years and followed for 2 years. Patients were categorized by appropriateness levels 0 to III depending on the number of the drugs prescribed divided by the number of drugs potentially indicated for each patient (0=none of the indicated medications prescribed and III=all indicated medications prescribed [optimal combination treatment]). High-risk was defined as having a history of stroke or coronary heart disease (CHD) prior to the index stroke event. Independent associations of medication appropriateness level with a major vascular event (stroke, CHD, or vascular death), ischemic stroke, and all-cause death were analyzed.
Compared with level 0, for major vascular events, the HR of level III in the low-risk group was 0.51 (95% CI: 0.20-1.28) and 0.32 (0.14-0.70) in the high-risk group; for stroke, the HR of level III in the low-risk group was 0.54 (0.16-1.77) and 0.25 (0.08-0.85) in the high-risk group; and for all-cause death, the HR of level III in the low-risk group was 0.66 (0.09-5.00) and 0.22 (0.06-0.78) in the high-risk group.
Optimal combination treatment is related to a significantly lower risk of future vascular events and death among high-risk patients after a recent non-cardioembolic stroke.
包括抗高血压药、抗血栓形成药和调脂药在内的二级卒中预防治疗的最佳组合与降低包括卒中在内的复发性血管风险相关。尚不清楚最佳组合治疗对基于血管风险水平的卒中患者是否有不同影响。
我们分析了一个临床试验数据集,该数据集包含3680名年龄≥35岁的近期非心源性卒中患者,并随访了2年。根据所开药物数量除以每个患者可能需要的药物数量,将患者分为0至III级合适程度(0 =未开任何指定药物,III =开了所有指定药物[最佳组合治疗])。高危定义为在首次卒中事件之前有卒中或冠心病(CHD)病史。分析了药物合适程度与主要血管事件(卒中、冠心病或血管性死亡)、缺血性卒中和全因死亡的独立关联。
与0级相比,对于主要血管事件,低风险组中III级的风险比(HR)为0.51(95%置信区间:0.20 - 1.28),高风险组中为0.32(0.14 - 0.70);对于卒中,低风险组中III级的HR为0.54(0.16 - 1.77),高风险组中为0.25(0.08 - 0.85);对于全因死亡,低风险组中III级的HR为0.66(0.09 - 5.00),高风险组中为0.22(0.06 - 0.78)。
最佳组合治疗与近期非心源性卒中后高危患者未来血管事件和死亡风险显著降低相关。