Kim Seo Hyun, Saver Jeffrey L
From the Department of Neurology, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea (S.H.K.); and Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles (J.L.S.).
Stroke. 2015 Jan;46(1):132-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006107. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
Body temperature (BT) is an important physiological factor in acute ischemic stroke. However, the relationship of initial BT to stroke severity and degree of benefit from thrombolytic therapy has been delineated incompletely.
We analyzed the public data set of the 2 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Tissue-Type Plasminogen Activator (tPA) stroke trials, comparing patients with lower (<37.0°C) and higher (≥37.0°C) presenting BT.
Among 595 patients (297 placebo and 298 tPA treated) with documented initial BT, 77.1% had initial BT <37.0°C and 22.9% ≥37.0°C. Patients with higher initial BT had lower baseline stroke severity in both tPA-treated patients (the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale median, 11 versus 15; P=0.05) and placebo-treated patients (median, 13 versus 16; P<0.01). Patients with higher initial BT also had lower infarction volume on computed tomography at 3 months in both tPA-treated patients (median, 9.6 versus 16.7 cm(3); P=0.08) and placebo-treated patients (median, 13.1 versus 28.1 cm(3); P=0.02), but no clinical outcome differences. Analysis of lytic treatment effect found no heterogeneity in the degree of tPA benefit in both higher and lower BT groups (≥37.0°C: odds ratio for the modified Rankin Scale 0-1 outcome, 2.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-6.21 and <37.0°C: odds ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.38-3.84; heterogeneity P=0.83).
In patients with hyperacute stroke, higher presenting temperatures are associated with less severe neurological deficits and reduced final infarct volumes. Presenting temperature does not modify the benefit of tPA on 3-month favorable outcome.
体温(BT)是急性缺血性卒中的一个重要生理因素。然而,初始体温与卒中严重程度及溶栓治疗获益程度之间的关系尚未完全阐明。
我们分析了两项美国国立神经疾病与卒中研究所组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(tPA)卒中试验的公共数据集,比较体温较低(<37.0°C)和较高(≥37.0°C)的患者。
在595例记录了初始体温的患者(297例接受安慰剂治疗,298例接受tPA治疗)中,77.1%的患者初始体温<37.0°C,22.9%的患者≥37.0°C。在接受tPA治疗的患者(美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表中位数,11比15;P=0.05)和接受安慰剂治疗的患者(中位数,13比16;P<0.01)中,初始体温较高的患者基线卒中严重程度较低。在接受tPA治疗的患者(中位数,9.6比16.7 cm³;P=0.08)和接受安慰剂治疗的患者(中位数,13.1比28.1 cm³;P=0.02)中,初始体温较高的患者在3个月时计算机断层扫描显示的梗死体积也较小,但临床结局无差异。溶栓治疗效果分析发现,体温较高和较低的两组中tPA获益程度无异质性(≥37.0°C:改良Rankin量表0-1结局的比值比,2.55;95%置信区间,1.05-6.21;<37.0°C:比值比,2.30;95%置信区间,1.38-3.84;异质性P=0.83)。
在超急性卒中患者中,较高的体温与较轻的神经功能缺损和最终梗死体积减小有关。体温不影响tPA对3个月良好结局的获益。