Al AlShaikh Sukainah, Quinn Terry, Dunn William, Walters Matthew, Dawson Jesse
Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Eur Stroke J. 2016 Jun;1(2):65-75. doi: 10.1177/2396987316647187. Epub 2016 May 5.
Non-adherence to secondary preventative medications after stroke is relatively common and associated with poorer outcomes. Non-adherence can be due to a number of patient, disease, medication or institutional factors. The aim of this review was to identify factors associated with non-adherence after stroke.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting factors associated with medication adherence after stroke. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL and Web of Knowledge. We followed PRISMA guidance. We assessed risk of bias of included studies using a pre-specified tool based on Cochrane guidance and the Newcastle-Ottawa scales. Where data allowed, we evaluated summary prevalence of non-adherence and association of factors commonly reported with medication adherence in included studies using random-effects model meta-analysis.
From 12,237 titles, we included 29 studies in our review. These included 69,137 patients. The majority of included studies (27/29) were considered to be at high risk of bias mainly due to performance bias. Non-adherence rate to secondary preventative medication reported by included studies was 30.9% (95% CI 26.8%-35.3%). Although many factors were reported as related to adherence in individual studies, on meta-analysis, absent history of atrial fibrillation (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.72-1.5), disability (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.93-1.72), polypharmacy (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.9-1.9) and age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.96-1.14) were not associated with adherence.
This review identified many factors related to adherence to preventative medications after stroke of which many are modifiable. Commonly reported factors included concerns about treatment, lack of support with medication intake, polypharmacy, increased disability and having more severe stroke.
Understanding factors associated with medication taking could inform strategies to improve adherence. Further research should assess whether interventions to promote adherence also improve outcomes.
中风后不坚持服用二级预防药物的情况较为常见,且与较差的预后相关。不坚持服药可能归因于多种患者、疾病、药物或机构因素。本综述的目的是确定中风后与不坚持服药相关的因素。
我们对报告中风后与药物依从性相关因素的研究进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、CENTRAL和知识网络。我们遵循PRISMA指南。我们使用基于Cochrane指南和纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表的预先指定工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。在数据允许的情况下,我们使用随机效应模型荟萃分析评估纳入研究中不坚持服药的汇总患病率以及与药物依从性常见报告因素的关联。
从12237个标题中,我们在综述中纳入了29项研究。这些研究包括69137名患者。纳入的大多数研究(27/29)被认为存在较高的偏倚风险,主要是由于执行偏倚。纳入研究报告的二级预防药物不坚持服用率为30.9%(95%CI 26.8%-35.3%)。尽管在个别研究中报告了许多与依从性相关的因素,但在荟萃分析中,无房颤病史(OR 1.02,95%CI 0.72-1.5)、残疾(OR 1.27,95%CI 0.93-1.72)、多重用药(OR 1.29,95%CI 0.9-1.9)和年龄(OR 1.04,95%CI 0.96-1.14)与依从性无关。
本综述确定了许多与中风后预防药物依从性相关的因素,其中许多是可改变的。常见报告的因素包括对治疗的担忧、药物服用缺乏支持、多重用药、残疾增加和中风更严重。
了解与服药相关的因素可为改善依从性的策略提供信息。进一步的研究应评估促进依从性的干预措施是否也能改善预后。