Hwang Jong Ho, Nam Kyoung Won, Yoon Sung Hoon, Kim Jinryoul, Yook Sunhyun, Hong Sung Hwa, Jang Dong Pyo, Kim In Young
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jun;8(2):102-10. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2015.8.2.102. Epub 2015 May 13.
The clinical effects of the simultaneous application of nonlinear frequency compression and dichotic hearing on people with hearing impairments have not been evaluated previously. In this study, the clinical effects of the simultaneous application of these two techniques on the recognition of consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) words with fricatives were evaluated using normal-hearing subjects and a hearing loss simulator operated in the severe hearing loss setting.
A total of 21 normal-hearing volunteers whose native language was English were recruited for this study, and two different hearing loss simulators, which were configured for severe hearing loss in the high-frequency range, were utilized. The subjects heard 82 English CVC words, and the word recognition score and response time were measured.
The experimental results demonstrated that the simultaneous application of these two techniques showed almost even performance compared to the sole application of nonlinear frequency compression in a severe hearing loss setting.
Though it is generally accepted that dichotic hearing can decrease the spectral masking thresholds of an hearing-impaired person, simultaneous application of the nonlinear frequency compression and dichotic hearing techniques did not significantly improve the recognition of words with fricatives compared to the sole application of nonlinear frequency compression in a severe hearing loss setting.
此前尚未评估非线性频率压缩和双耳分听同时应用于听力障碍者的临床效果。在本研究中,使用听力正常的受试者以及在重度听力损失环境下运行的听力损失模拟器,评估了这两种技术同时应用对含摩擦音的辅音-元音-辅音(CVC)单词识别的临床效果。
本研究招募了21名以英语为母语的听力正常志愿者,并使用了两种针对高频范围重度听力损失配置的不同听力损失模拟器。受试者听取了82个英语CVC单词,并测量了单词识别分数和反应时间。
实验结果表明,在重度听力损失环境下,与单独应用非线性频率压缩相比,这两种技术同时应用表现出几乎相同的性能。
虽然人们普遍认为双耳分听可以降低听力受损者的频谱掩蔽阈值,但在重度听力损失环境下,与单独应用非线性频率压缩相比,非线性频率压缩和双耳分听技术同时应用并未显著提高含摩擦音单词的识别率。