Finikiotis G
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Aug;29(3 Pt 1):253-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1989.tb01731.x.
An analysis is presented of the indications for, and findings on, hysteroscopy in 523 patients undergoing gynaecological investigation or treatment. Abnormal uterine bleeding or discharge was the indication for investigation in 202 patients. Based on hysteroscopic observation, dilatation and curettage (D & C) was adjudged unnecessary in 114 (56%) and a subsequent D & C on these patients revealed no histological abnormalities. In the remainder, more abnormalities were observed visually on hysteroscopy than were detected by D & C. The results suggest that D & C should be replaced by hysteroscopy and biopsy as a first-line investigation of abnormal uterine bleeding or discharge.
对523例接受妇科检查或治疗的患者进行宫腔镜检查的指征及检查结果进行了分析。202例患者因子宫异常出血或分泌物异常而接受检查。根据宫腔镜观察,114例(56%)患者被判定无需进行刮宫术(D&C),随后对这些患者进行的刮宫术未发现组织学异常。在其余患者中,宫腔镜检查肉眼观察到的异常比刮宫术检测到的更多。结果表明,刮宫术应由宫腔镜检查和活检取代,作为子宫异常出血或分泌物异常的一线检查方法。