Maroulakos Georgios, Nagy William W, Kontogiorgos Elias D
Assistant Professor, Department of General Dental Sciences, Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, Wis.
Professor and Director, Graduate Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Sciences, Texas A&M University, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas.
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Sep;114(3):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
It is unclear which post and core system performs best when bonded to severely compromised endodontically treated teeth.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the fracture resistance and mode of failure of severely compromised teeth restored with 3 different adhesively bonded post and core systems.
Thirty extracted endodontically treated maxillary anterior teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups, CPC, gold cast post and core; TPC, titanium prefabricated post/composite resin core; and FPC, quartz fiber reinforced post/composite resin core. All posts were adhesively cemented. All cores resembled a central incisor preparation with no remaining tooth structure above the finish line. Cast gold crowns were fabricated and cemented adhesively. The specimens were aged with thermocycling and cyclic loading. Two specimens per group were randomly selected for micro-computed tomographic imaging before and after aging. Failure was induced with a universal testing machine. The mode of failure was characterized by the interface separation. Data were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA (α=.05) followed by post hoc tests (Bonferroni).
A statistically significant difference was found among the 3 groups (P=.002). CPC was significantly different than TPC (P=.008) or FPC (P=.003). The primary mode of failure for CPC and TPC was root fracture, and for FPC post debonding.
Severely compromised endodontically treated teeth restored with bonded gold cast post and cores showed significantly higher fracture resistance.
当粘结到根管治疗严重受损的牙齿上时,哪种桩核系统性能最佳尚不清楚。
本研究的目的是调查用3种不同的粘结桩核系统修复的严重受损牙齿的抗折性和失效模式。
30颗拔除的根管治疗后的上颌前牙随机分为3组,CPC组,铸造金桩核;TPC组,钛预成桩/复合树脂核;FPC组,石英纤维增强桩/复合树脂核。所有桩均采用粘结剂粘结。所有核均模拟中央切牙预备,在完成线以上无剩余牙体结构。制作铸造金冠并用粘结剂粘结。对标本进行热循环和循环加载老化处理。每组随机选取2个标本在老化前后进行微型计算机断层扫描成像。用万能试验机诱导失效。通过界面分离来表征失效模式。数据采用单因素方差分析(α = 0.05),随后进行事后检验(Bonferroni检验)。
3组之间存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.002)。CPC组与TPC组(P = 0.008)和FPC组(P = 0.003)有显著差异。CPC组和TPC组的主要失效模式是牙根折断,FPC组是桩脱粘。
用粘结铸造金桩核修复的根管治疗严重受损牙齿显示出显著更高的抗折性。