Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia.
Department of Business Administration, Asper School of Business, University of Manitoba.
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Jan;101(1):108-21. doi: 10.1037/apl0000034. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
The multifoci perspective of justice proposes that individuals tend to target their (in)justice reactions toward the perceived source of the mistreatment. Empirical support for target-specific reactions, however, has been mixed. To explore theoretically relevant reasons for these discrepant results and address unanswered questions in the multifoci justice literature, the present research examines how different justice sources might interactively predict target-specific reactions, and whether these effects occur as a function of moral identity. Results from a sample of North American frontline service employees (N = 314, Study 1) showed that among employees with lower levels of moral identity, low supervisor justice exacerbated the association between low customer justice and customer-directed sabotage, whereas this exacerbation effect was not observed among employees with higher levels of moral identity. This 3-way interaction effect was replicated in a sample of South Korean employees (N = 265, Study 2).
多焦点正义观认为,个体往往会将(不)公正反应针对被认为是虐待的来源。然而,针对特定目标的反应的实证支持却是混杂的。为了探索这些不一致结果的理论相关原因,并解决多焦点正义文献中未解决的问题,本研究探讨了不同的正义来源如何相互作用地预测针对特定目标的反应,以及这些效应是否是道德认同的函数。一项针对北美的一线服务员工的样本(N=314,研究 1)的结果表明,在道德认同水平较低的员工中,低主管正义加剧了低顾客正义与顾客指向性破坏之间的关联,而在道德认同水平较高的员工中则没有观察到这种加剧效应。这一 3 路交互效应在一项韩国员工的样本中得到了复制(N=265,研究 2)。