Walker L. Cisler College of Business, Northern Michigan University.
Rutgers School of Management and Labor Relations, Rutgers University.
J Appl Psychol. 2019 Apr;104(4):495-510. doi: 10.1037/apl0000359. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
We utilize the social intuitionist approach to moral judgment and moral disengagement theory to understand why and when employees sabotage customers. We contend that when customers mistreat employees (i.e., customer mistreatment), employees experience intuitive emotional reactions in the form of hostility, which automatically activates devaluation of targets, a specific facet of moral disengagement. In turn, employees become unencumbered by moral self-regulation and sabotage customers who mistreat them (i.e., customer-directed sabotage). We further argue that our serially mediated model is moderated by employees' perceptions of the organization's ethical climate. When ethical climates are perceived as being low, employees' hostile reactions toward misbehaving customers produce a positive relationship with devaluation of targets, and devaluation of targets results in a positive relationship with customer-directed sabotage. These positive relationships do not hold when ethical climate is perceived as being high. We test our theoretical model using a field sample of customer service employees and an experimental study to establish causality. Our results provide general support for our hypotheses. We discuss theoretical and practical implications and opportunities for future research. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
我们利用社会直觉主义方法和道德脱离理论来理解员工为什么会以及何时会破坏客户关系。我们认为,当客户虐待员工时(即顾客虐待),员工会产生敌对情绪等直觉性的情绪反应,这种情绪反应自动激活了目标贬低,这是道德脱离的一个特定方面。反过来,员工不受道德自我调节的约束,并破坏虐待他们的客户(即针对客户的破坏)。我们进一步认为,我们的串联中介模型受到员工对组织道德氛围感知的调节。当道德氛围被感知为低水平时,员工对不良行为客户的敌对反应与目标贬低之间产生积极关系,而目标贬低又与针对客户的破坏之间产生积极关系。当道德氛围被感知为高水平时,这些积极关系并不成立。我们使用客户服务员工的现场样本和实验研究来检验我们的理论模型,以确定因果关系。我们的研究结果普遍支持我们的假设。我们讨论了理论和实践意义以及未来研究的机会。