Özdemir Raziye, Rao Chalapati, Öcek Zeliha, Dinç Horasan Gönül
Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Karabuk University Health School, Karabuk, Turkey.
Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 10;15:545. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1904-1.
The Turkish government has implemented several reforms to improve the Turkish Statistical Institute Death Reporting System (TURKSTAT-DRS) since 2009. However, there has been no assessment to evaluate the impact of these reforms on causes of death statistics. This study attempted to analyse the impact of these reforms on the TURKSTAT-DRS for Turkey, and in the case of Izmir, one of the most developed provinces in Turkey.
The evaluation framework comprised three main components each with specific criteria. Firstly, data from TURKSTAT for Turkey and Izmir for the periods 2001-2008 and 2009-2013 were assessed in terms of the following dimensions that represent quality of mortality statistics (a. completeness of death registration, b. trends in proportions of deaths with ill-defined causes). Secondly, the quality of information recorded on individual death certificates from Izmir in 2010 was analysed for a. missing information, b. timeliness of death notifications and c. characteristics of deaths with ill-defined causes. Finally, TURKSTAT data were analysed to estimate life tables and summary mortality indicators for Turkey and Izmir, as well as the leading causes-of-death in Turkey in 2013.
Registration of adult deaths in Izmir as well as at the national level for Turkey has considerably improved since the introduction of reforms in 2009, along with marked decline in the proportions of deaths assigned ill-defined causes. Death certificates from Izmir indicated significant gaps in recorded information for demographic as well as epidemiological variables, particularly for infant deaths, and in the detailed recording of causes of death. Life expectancy at birth estimated from local data is 3-4 years higher than similar estimates for Turkey from international studies, and this requires further investigation and confirmation.
The TURKSTAT-DRS is now an improved source of mortality and cause of death statistics for Turkey. The reliability and validity of TURKSTAT data needs to be established through a detailed research program to evaluate completeness of death registration and validity of registered causes of death. Similar evaluation and data analysis of mortality indicators is required at regular intervals at national and sub-national level, to increase confidence in their utility as primary data for epidemiology and health policy.
自2009年以来,土耳其政府实施了多项改革,以完善土耳其统计局死亡报告系统(TURKSTAT-DRS)。然而,尚未对这些改革对死亡原因统计的影响进行评估。本研究试图分析这些改革对土耳其TURKSTAT-DRS的影响,并以土耳其最发达的省份之一伊兹密尔为例进行分析。
评估框架包括三个主要部分,每个部分都有具体标准。首先,从以下代表死亡率统计质量的维度评估2001 - 2008年和2009 - 2013年土耳其及伊兹密尔的TURKSTAT数据(a. 死亡登记的完整性,b. 死因不明的死亡比例趋势)。其次,分析2010年伊兹密尔个人死亡证明上记录的信息质量,包括a. 缺失信息,b. 死亡通知的及时性,以及c. 死因不明的死亡特征。最后,分析TURKSTAT数据,以估计土耳其和伊兹密尔的生命表和综合死亡率指标,以及2013年土耳其的主要死因。
自2009年改革实施以来,伊兹密尔以及土耳其全国范围内的成人死亡登记有了显著改善,死因不明的死亡比例也显著下降。伊兹密尔的死亡证明显示,在人口统计和流行病学变量的记录信息方面存在重大差距,特别是婴儿死亡情况,以及死亡原因的详细记录方面。根据当地数据估算的出生时预期寿命比国际研究中对土耳其的类似估算高3 - 4岁,这需要进一步调查和确认。
TURKSTAT-DRS现在是土耳其死亡率和死亡原因统计的一个改进来源。需要通过详细的研究计划来确定TURKSTAT数据 的可靠性和有效性,以评估死亡登记的完整性和登记死因的有效性。国家和次国家层面需要定期进行类似的死亡率指标评估和数据分析,以增强对其作为流行病学和卫生政策主要数据的效用 的信心。