• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗器械制造商开展的上市后临床研究:一项横断面调查

Post-market clinical research conducted by medical device manufacturers: a cross-sectional survey.

作者信息

Ross Joseph S, Blount Katrina L, Ritchie Jessica D, Hodshon Beth, Krumholz Harlan M

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Med Devices (Auckl). 2015 May 27;8:241-9. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S82964. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.2147/MDER.S82964
PMID:26060416
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4454210/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the US, once a medical device is made available for use, several requirements have been established by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to ensure ongoing post-market surveillance of device safety and effectiveness. Our objective was to determine how commonly medical device manufacturers initiate post-market clinical studies or augment FDA post-market surveillance requirements for higher-risk devices that are most often approved via the FDA's pre-market approval (PMA) pathway.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 47 manufacturers with operations in California, Minnesota, and Massachusetts who market devices approved via the PMA pathway. Among 22 respondents (response rate =47%), nearly all self-reported conducting post-market clinical research studies, commonly between 1 and 5; only 1 respondent reported never conducting post-market clinical research studies. While manufacturers most often engaged in these studies to satisfy FDA requirements, other reasons were reported, including performance monitoring and surveillance and market acceptance initiatives. Risks of conducting and not conducting post-market clinical research studies were described through open-ended response to questions.

CONCLUSION

Medical device manufacturers commonly initiate post-market clinical studies at the request of the FDA. Clinical data from these studies should be integrated into national post-market surveillance initiatives.

摘要

背景

在美国,一旦医疗设备可供使用,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)已制定了多项要求,以确保对设备安全性和有效性进行持续的上市后监测。我们的目标是确定医疗设备制造商启动上市后临床研究或加强FDA对通过FDA上市前批准(PMA)途径最常获批的高风险设备的上市后监测要求的频率。

方法与结果

我们对在加利福尼亚州、明尼苏达州和马萨诸塞州开展业务且销售通过PMA途径获批设备的47家制造商进行了横断面调查。在22名受访者中(回复率 = 47%),几乎所有人都自我报告开展了上市后临床研究,通常为1至5项;只有1名受访者报告从未开展过上市后临床研究。虽然制造商开展这些研究大多是为了满足FDA的要求,但也报告了其他原因,包括性能监测与监督以及市场接受度举措。通过对问题的开放式回答描述了开展和不开展上市后临床研究的风险。

结论

医疗设备制造商通常应FDA要求启动上市后临床研究。这些研究的临床数据应纳入国家上市后监测举措。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/4454210/982372cef457/mder-8-241Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/4454210/982372cef457/mder-8-241Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7339/4454210/982372cef457/mder-8-241Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Post-market clinical research conducted by medical device manufacturers: a cross-sectional survey.医疗器械制造商开展的上市后临床研究:一项横断面调查
Med Devices (Auckl). 2015 May 27;8:241-9. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S82964. eCollection 2015.
2
How do Orthopaedic Devices Change After Their Initial FDA Premarket Approval?骨科器械在首次获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)上市前批准后会发生怎样的变化?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Apr;474(4):1053-68. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4634-x. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
3
Incremental Revisions across the Life Span of Ophthalmic Devices after Initial Food and Drug Administration Premarket Approval, 1979-2015.1979 年至 2015 年初始食品和药物管理局上市前批准后眼科设备寿命期间的增量修订。
Ophthalmology. 2017 Aug;124(8):1237-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.040. Epub 2017 May 10.
4
Improving the postmarket surveillance of total joint arthroplasty devices.改善全关节置换装置的上市后监测。
Open Rheumatol J. 2008;2:7-12. doi: 10.2174/1874312900802010007. Epub 2008 Feb 25.
5
Characteristics of Clinical Studies Conducted Over the Total Product Life Cycle of High-Risk Therapeutic Medical Devices Receiving FDA Premarket Approval in 2010 and 2011.2010 年和 2011 年 FDA 上市前批准的高风险治疗性医疗器械全产品生命周期临床试验特点。
JAMA. 2015 Aug 11;314(6):604-12. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.8761.
6
Drugs, Devices, and the FDA: Part 2: An Overview of Approval Processes: FDA Approval of Medical Devices.药物、器械与美国食品药品监督管理局:第二部分:审批流程概述:医疗器械的美国食品药品监督管理局审批
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2016 Jun 27;1(4):277-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.03.009. eCollection 2016 Jun.
7
Diversity in Medical Device Clinical Trials: Do We Know What Works for Which Patients?医疗器械临床试验中的多样性:我们知道哪种方法对哪些患者有效吗?
Milbank Q. 2018 Sep;96(3):499-529. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12344.
8
Post market surveillance in the german medical device sector - current state and future perspectives.德国医疗器械领域的上市后监督——现状与未来展望
Health Policy. 2017 Aug;121(8):880-886. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
9
10
Iodine-131 Tositumomab: (131)I-anti-B1 antibody, (131)I-tositumomab, anti-CD20 murine monoclonal antibody-I-131, B1, Bexxar, (131)I-anti-B1 antibody, iodine-131 tositumomab, iodine-131 anti-B1 antibody, tositumomab.碘-131托西莫单抗:(131)I-抗B1抗体、(131)I-托西莫单抗、抗CD20鼠单克隆抗体-I-131、B1、美罗华、(131)I-抗B1抗体、碘-131托西莫单抗、碘-131抗B1抗体、托西莫单抗
BioDrugs. 2003;17(4):290-5. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200317040-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
Revolutionizing Utility of Big Data Analytics in Personalized Cardiovascular Healthcare.革新大数据分析在个性化心血管医疗保健中的应用
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Apr 27;12(5):463. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050463.
2
Analysis of Postapproval Clinical Trials of Therapeutics Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Without Clinical Postmarketing Requirements or Commitments.分析美国食品和药物管理局批准的治疗药物的批准后临床试验,这些药物无临床上市后要求或承诺。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 May 3;2(5):e193410. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3410.

本文引用的文献

1
Presumed safe no more: lessons from the Wingspan saga on regulation of devices.
BMJ. 2014 Jan 22;348:g93. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g93.
2
New and unproved medical devices.新型且未经证实的医疗设备。
BMJ. 2013 Dec 19;347:f7413. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7413.
3
The inferior vena cava filter: how could a medical device be so well accepted without any evidence of efficacy?下腔静脉滤器:一种没有任何疗效证据的医疗器械怎么会被如此广泛接受呢?
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 8;173(7):493-5; discussion 495. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.2725.
4
Inclusion of comparative effectiveness data in high-risk cardiovascular device studies at the time of premarket approval.在上市前批准时将比较有效性数据纳入高风险心血管设备研究中。
JAMA. 2012 Nov 7;308(17):1740-2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.14491.
5
Strength of study evidence examined by the FDA in premarket approval of cardiovascular devices.美国食品和药物管理局在心血管设备上市前批准中检查的研究证据的强度。
JAMA. 2009 Dec 23;302(24):2679-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1899.