Rasmussen Keith G
From the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
J ECT. 2016 Mar;32(1):7-12. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000257.
Several decades of research have yielded much information on the cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and have informed ECT technical factors such as electrode placement, stimulus dosing, and stimulus parameters. However, the question of what type of cognitive testing should be part of routine ECT practice has not been definitively clarified. The author reviews the recommendations, or lack thereof, in several published ECT guidelines and discusses the purposes that cognitive testing during ECT should serve and difficulties that most ECT services would encounter with intensive testing schedules. Practical utility of formal cognitive testing during and after ECT has not been satisfactorily demonstrated in ECT research. In addition, several key aspects of testing, such as cognitive domain to be tested, specific tests to be used, personnel to do the testing, time points of testing, and exactly how the test results will be interpreted and used have yet to be determined with precision. It is suggested that research efforts be undertaken to address these large gaps in ECT practice.
几十年来的研究已经产生了大量关于电休克疗法(ECT)认知效应的信息,并为ECT的技术因素提供了参考,如电极放置、刺激剂量和刺激参数。然而,何种类型的认知测试应成为常规ECT实践的一部分这一问题尚未得到明确阐明。作者回顾了若干已发表的ECT指南中的相关建议(或缺乏相关建议的情况),并讨论了ECT期间认知测试应达到的目的以及大多数ECT服务机构在密集测试计划中会遇到的困难。ECT研究尚未令人满意地证明ECT期间及之后进行正式认知测试的实际效用。此外,测试的几个关键方面,如要测试的认知领域、要使用的具体测试、进行测试的人员、测试的时间点,以及测试结果将如何被精确解释和使用,还有待确定。建议开展研究工作以填补ECT实践中的这些巨大空白。