Choi Taesoo, Yoo Koo Han, Choi Seung-Kwon, Kim Dong Soo, Lee Dong-Gi, Min Gyeong Eun, Jeon Seung Hyun, Lee Hyung-Lae, Jeong In-Kyung
Department of Urology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Korean J Urol. 2015 Jun;56(6):455-60. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.6.455. Epub 2015 May 27.
The aim of our study was to evaluate the association of several factors with spontaneous stone expulsion, including ureteral stone characteristics (size, location, hydronephrosis, perinephric stranding), types of medications prescribed (α-blocker, low-dose steroid), and other possible demographic and health-history factors (gender, age, serum creatinine, underlying diabetes mellitus [DM], and hypertension).
A total of 366 patients with ureteral stones were enrolled. All patients underwent watchful waiting without any invasive procedures. Initial diagnoses of ureteral stones were confirmed by computed tomography scans, which were taken at approximately 1-month intervals to check for stone expulsion. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify significant factors that contributed to stone expulsion.
Among 366 patients, 335 patients (91.5%) experienced spontaneous stone passage during a mean follow-up period of 2.95±2.62 weeks. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the success of spontaneous stone passage. Univariate analyses revealed that stone location (p=0.003), stone size (p=0.021), and underlying DM (p<0.001) were significant predictors of stone passage. Multivariate analyses confirmed that stone size (p=0.010), stone location (p=0.008), and underlying DM (p=0.003) were independent predictive factors affecting stone passage.
Stone size, location, and underlying DM were confirmed to be significant predictive factors for spontaneous passage of ureteral stones. Urologists should consider active procedures, such as shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy, rather than conservative management in patients presenting with proximally located stones, large ureteral stones, or underlying DM.
本研究旨在评估多个因素与输尿管结石自然排出的相关性,这些因素包括输尿管结石特征(大小、位置、肾积水、肾周渗出)、所开药物类型(α受体阻滞剂、低剂量类固醇)以及其他可能的人口统计学和健康史因素(性别、年龄、血清肌酐、基础糖尿病[DM]和高血压)。
共纳入366例输尿管结石患者。所有患者均接受观察等待,未进行任何侵入性操作。输尿管结石的初始诊断通过计算机断层扫描确认,扫描间隔约为1个月,以检查结石是否排出。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定有助于结石排出的显著因素。
在366例患者中,335例患者(91.5%)在平均2.95±2.62周的随访期内实现了结石自然排出。根据结石自然排出的成功情况将患者分为两组。单因素分析显示,结石位置(p=0.003)、结石大小(p=0.021)和基础DM(p<0.001)是结石排出的显著预测因素。多因素分析证实,结石大小(p=0.010)、结石位置(p=0.008)和基础DM(p=0.003)是影响结石排出的独立预测因素。
结石大小、位置和基础DM被证实是输尿管结石自然排出的显著预测因素。对于存在近端结石、较大输尿管结石或基础DM的患者,泌尿外科医生应考虑采取积极的治疗措施,如冲击波碎石术或输尿管镜检查,而不是保守治疗。