Wang Liwei, Meng Xiuli, Guo Xiangyang, Zhao Wei, Wang Zhenyu
Department of Anesthesiology, Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Department of Neurosurgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China; Email:
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2015 Mar 17;95(10):753-6.
To evaluate the effects of different end-tidal concentrations of sevoflurane on somatosensory evoked potentials, to explore the feasibility of sevoflurane applied in such kind of surgery, so as to provide useful information in making anesthesia plan for spinal cord surgery.
Thirty-two patients scheduled for spinal cord surgery (ASA I-II, 18-65 years old) were enrolled. After induction of anesthesia, they were assigned to receive sevoflurane anesthesia of increment end-tidal concentration in the sequence of 0.0%, 0.5%, 1.0% and 1.5% respectively, under a background intravenous infusion of propofol and remifentanil. Remifentanil infusion rate was 0.2 µg·kg⁻¹ ·min⁻¹, while the propofol infusion rate was adjusted to maintain BIS values within the range of 30-50. The amplitude and latency of each SSEPs were recorded and compared.
Sevoflurane inhibited SSEPs in a dose-dependent manner, SSEPs amplitude significantly decreased following increased end-tidal sevoflurane concentration. The amplitudes of the left side were 2.36 (0.42-9.87), 2.14 (0.52-9.44), 1.94 (0.47-9.44), 1.64 (0.36-7.46) µV respectively (F = 21.66, P < 0.01). The amplitudes of the right side were 2.71 (0.43-7.1), 2.73 (0.43-7.1), 2.34 (0.44-6.6), 1.64 (0.39-6.15) µV respectively (F = 33.94, P < 0.01). SSEPs latencies were significantly prolonged, on the left side, the latencies were (41.48 ± 3.45), (42.45 ± 3.60), (43.20 ± 3.42), (44.38 ± 3.78) ms, respectively (F = 68.07, P < 0.01). On the right side, the latencies were (40.65 ± 4.91), (41.53 ± 4.76), (42.31 ± 4.93), (43.39 ± 4.79)ms, respectively (F = 56.52, P < 0.01). Yet, as a monitoring modality for dynamic observation, SSEPs still could be monitored successfully under sevoflurane anesthesia in all these 32 patients.
Sevoflurane has depression effects on SSEPs in a dose-dependent manner. It can decrease the amplitudes and prolong the latencies. Considering significant individual difference, the feasibility of sevoflurane in such kind of surgery can be determined by measuring base amplitude of SSEPs under total intravenous anesthesia.
评估不同呼气末七氟醚浓度对体感诱发电位的影响,探讨七氟醚应用于此类手术的可行性,为脊髓手术麻醉方案的制定提供有用信息。
选取32例拟行脊髓手术的患者(ASA I-II级,年龄18-65岁)。麻醉诱导后,在丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼静脉输注的背景下,分别按呼气末浓度递增顺序给予0.0%、0.5%、1.0%和1.5%的七氟醚麻醉。瑞芬太尼输注速率为0.2μg·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹,丙泊酚输注速率根据BIS值调整,维持在30-50范围内。记录并比较各体感诱发电位的波幅和潜伏期。
七氟醚对体感诱发电位有剂量依赖性抑制作用,随着呼气末七氟醚浓度升高,体感诱发电位波幅显著降低。左侧波幅分别为2.36(0.42-9.87)、2.14(0.52-9.44)、1.94(0.47-9.44)、1.64(0.36-7.46)μV(F = 21.66,P < 0.01)。右侧波幅分别为2.71(0.43-7.1)、2.73(0.43-7.1)、2.34(0.44-6.6)、1.64(0.39-6.15)μV(F = 33.94,P < 0.01)。体感诱发电位潜伏期显著延长,左侧潜伏期分别为(41.48 ± 3.45)、(42.45 ± 3.60)、(43.20 ± 3.42)、(44.38 ± 3.78)ms(F = 68.07,P < 0.01)。右侧潜伏期分别为(40.65 ± 4.91)、(41.53 ± 4.76)、(42.31 ± 4.93)、(43.39 ± 4.79)ms(F = 56.52,P < 0.01)。然而,作为动态观察的监测手段,这32例患者在七氟醚麻醉下均能成功监测体感诱发电位。
七氟醚对体感诱发电位有剂量依赖性抑制作用,可降低波幅、延长潜伏期。考虑到个体差异较大,全凭静脉麻醉下通过测量体感诱发电位基础波幅来确定七氟醚在此类手术中的可行性。