Wei Dong-mei, Wu Li-jing, Gao Ai-yu, Li Qin, Cheng Lan, Wang Hai-jun
Department of Child, Adolescent and Women's Health, Institute of Child and Adolescent Health, Peking University School of Public Health, Beijing 100191, China.
Primary and Secondary School Health Care Center of Dongcheng District, Beijing 100007,China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Jun 18;47(3):390-4.
To explore the relations among screen-based sedentary behaviors (SSB), family factors and body mass index (BMI) of children, and to study how family factors have effect on BMI through influencing SSB.
A total of 1,846 students aged 7-11 years from 12 primary schools in one district of Beijing were included. Their body weight and height were measured to calculate the BMI. The time of SSB and family factors were investigated by using questionnaires. The time of SSB was the total time of watching TV and videos, playing computer games and iPad each day during the past 7 days recalled by children. The family factors included the parents' education, occupation, the parents'time of SSB, whether the parents told their child the harm of SSB, the parents'time limit for the children's SSB. The parents'education and occupation were used for calculating the family socioeconomic score.
The median time of SSB for children was 1 hour/day, and the interquartile range was 1 hour/day. The BMI of the children with the parents' time limit for the children's SSB less than 120 min/day were smaller than the children with the parents'time limit not less than 120 min/day, in both the boys (1.63 kg/m2, P<0.001) and the girls (0.85 kg/m2, P=0.004). The family socioeconomic score, the parents'SSB time, whether the parents told their children the harm of SSB were not related to the children's BMI . The mediation effects of SSB time for children on the association between the parents'time limit for the children's SSB and BMI were -0.222 kg/m2 (95%CI:-0.432, -0.095) for boys and -0.187 kg/m2 (95%CI: -0.507, -0.049) for girls, which accounted for 13.67% of the total effects for boys and 22.11% for girls.
The parents' time limit for the children's SSB has effect on their BMI through influencing their SSB time. Parents' supervision on the behaviors of children produces larger benefit for BMI than health education conveyed by parents. Therefore, parents' participation in supervising the behaviors of children are indispensable for preventing and controlling childhood obesity.
探讨儿童基于屏幕的久坐行为(SSB)、家庭因素与体重指数(BMI)之间的关系,并研究家庭因素如何通过影响SSB对BMI产生影响。
纳入北京市某区12所小学的1846名7-11岁学生。测量他们的体重和身高以计算BMI。通过问卷调查调查SSB时间和家庭因素。SSB时间是儿童回忆的过去7天中每天看电视和视频、玩电脑游戏和iPad的总时间。家庭因素包括父母的教育程度、职业、父母的SSB时间、父母是否告知孩子SSB的危害、父母对孩子SSB的时间限制。父母的教育程度和职业用于计算家庭社会经济得分。
儿童SSB的中位时间为1小时/天,四分位间距为1小时/天。父母对孩子SSB时间限制小于120分钟/天的儿童的BMI低于父母对孩子SSB时间限制不少于120分钟/天的儿童,男孩(1.63kg/m²,P<0.001)和女孩(0.85kg/m²,P=0.004)均如此。家庭社会经济得分、父母的SSB时间、父母是否告知孩子SSB的危害与孩子的BMI无关。男孩中,儿童SSB时间对父母对孩子SSB时间限制与BMI之间关联的中介效应为-0.222kg/m²(95%CI:-0.432,-0.095),女孩为-0.187kg/m²(95%CI:-0.507,-0.049),分别占男孩总效应的13.67%和女孩总效应的22.11%。
父母对孩子SSB的时间限制通过影响孩子的SSB时间对其BMI产生影响。父母对孩子行为的监督对BMI产生的益处大于父母传达的健康教育。因此,父母参与监督孩子的行为对于预防和控制儿童肥胖是不可或缺的。