Parashar Akhil, Agarwal Shikhar, Krishnaswamy Amar, Garg Aatish, Poddar Kanhaiya L, Sud Karan, Ellis Stephen, Tuzcu E Murat, Kapadia Samir R
Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Aug 15;116(4):508-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 21.
There is a paucity of evidence on the impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) on long-term outcomes in patients with ejection fraction (EF) >40% after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We compared long-term all-cause mortality between patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40% discharged on ACEi/ARB with patients who were discharged on neither of these agents. Patients discharged after percutaneous intervention for STEMI from our catheterization laboratories from January 2002 to December 2011 were considered for inclusion. Patients were excluded if they had LVEF <40% or chronic kidney disease or hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg any time after the procedure). Long-term mortality and discharge medications were determined using the Social Security Death Index and electronic medical record review, respectively. A total of 988 patients were included. The median follow-up duration was 4.6 years. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no significant difference in long-term all-cause mortality in patients discharged on ACEi/ARB compared with those who were not discharged on these medications. The number needed to treat to prevent 1 death at 1 year was 714. In addition, multivariable Cox proportional hazard modeling failed to demonstrate any beneficial effect of ACEi/ARB similar to Kaplan-Meir analysis (hazard ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.57 to 1.36). In conclusion, we found no significant benefit in long-term mortality using ACEi/ARB in patients with LVEF >40% after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI.
关于血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEi)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)对ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后射血分数(EF)>40%的患者长期预后影响的证据不足。我们比较了出院时接受ACEi/ARB治疗的左心室射血分数(LVEF)>40%的患者与未接受这两种药物治疗的患者之间的长期全因死亡率。纳入2002年1月至2011年12月期间从我们的导管实验室因STEMI接受经皮介入治疗后出院的患者。如果患者LVEF<40%、患有慢性肾病或低血压(术后任何时间收缩压<90mmHg)则排除。分别使用社会保障死亡指数和电子病历回顾来确定长期死亡率和出院用药情况。共纳入988例患者。中位随访时间为4.6年。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,出院时接受ACEi/ARB治疗的患者与未接受这些药物治疗的患者相比,长期全因死亡率无显著差异。1年内预防1例死亡所需治疗人数为714。此外,多变量Cox比例风险模型未能证明ACEi/ARB有任何类似于Kaplan-Meir分析的有益效果(风险比0.88,95%置信区间0.57至1.36)。总之,我们发现在STEMI患者行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,LVEF>40%的患者使用ACEi/ARB对长期死亡率无显著益处。