Stephen Divya, Vatsa Manju, Lodha Rakesh, Kabra S K
College of Nursing.
College of Nursing
Respir Care. 2015 Dec;60(12):1743-8. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03213. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
Information on the comparative efficacy of single deep breathing versus tidal breathing for inhaled asthma medications is limited, although such information can be of much use for the treatment of patients suffering from asthma. The objective of the present study was to compare the relative difference in improvement in peak expiratory flow (PEF) with single maximal inhalation with breath-holding versus 5 tidal breaths during inhalation of salbutamol from a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) with valved holding chamber (VHC) in children 5-15 y of age with asthma.
The randomized controlled trial was carried out on children with asthma between 5 and 15 y of age using a pMDI with a VHC either by a single deep breath with breath-hold or 5 tidal breaths. The experimental group received 200 μg of salbutamol from the pMDI with VHC with a single maximal inhalation and breath-hold technique, whereas the control group received 200 μg of salbutamol from pMDI with VHC using the 5 tidal breaths technique. The outcome variable, PEF, was reassessed 30 min after salbutamol use.
Eighty-two subjects (mean age 8.79 ± 2.5 y, 65 boys and 17 girls) were analyzed. There was significant improvement in the PEF, from baseline (pre-intervention) to post-intervention within the single maximal inhalation with breath-hold group and tidal breathing group independently (P < .001). The mean difference in improvement in PEF between the single maximal inhalation with a breath-hold and 5 tidal breaths group was 30.0 ± 18.16 and 28.29 ± 13.94 L/min, respectively, and was not statistically significant (P = .88).
Single maximal inhalation with a breath-hold technique is not superior to tidal breathing for improvement in PEF following salbutamol inhalation. Either method may be used in children between 5 and 15 y of age. (India's Clinical Trials Registry CTRI/2013/04/003559.).
关于吸入性哮喘药物单次深呼吸与潮式呼吸的相对疗效信息有限,尽管此类信息对哮喘患者的治疗可能非常有用。本研究的目的是比较5至15岁哮喘儿童使用带储雾罐的压力定量吸入器(pMDI)吸入沙丁胺醇时,单次最大吸气后屏气与5次潮式呼吸相比,呼气峰值流速(PEF)改善的相对差异。
对5至15岁的哮喘儿童进行随机对照试验,使用带储雾罐的pMDI,采用单次深呼吸后屏气或5次潮式呼吸。实验组通过单次最大吸气后屏气技术从带储雾罐的pMDI中吸入200μg沙丁胺醇,而对照组使用5次潮式呼吸技术从带储雾罐的pMDI中吸入200μg沙丁胺醇。在使用沙丁胺醇30分钟后重新评估结局变量PEF。
分析了82名受试者(平均年龄8.79±2.5岁,65名男孩和17名女孩)。单次最大吸气后屏气组和潮式呼吸组内,从基线(干预前)到干预后PEF均有显著改善(P<.001)。单次最大吸气后屏气组与5次潮式呼吸组PEF改善的平均差异分别为30.0±18.16和28.29±13.94L/分钟,差异无统计学意义(P=.88)。
吸入沙丁胺醇后,单次最大吸气后屏气技术在改善PEF方面并不优于潮式呼吸。5至15岁的儿童可任选其中一种方法。(印度临床试验注册CTRI/2013/04/003559)