Suppr超能文献

对于儿童,使用储雾罐和有阀手持吸入器进行气雾剂吸入需要几次潮气呼吸。

Aerosol inhalation from spacers and valved holding chambers requires few tidal breaths for children.

机构信息

School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2010 Dec;126(6):e1493-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1377. Epub 2010 Nov 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The goal was to determine the number of breaths required to inhale salbutamol from different spacers/valved holding chambers (VHCs).

METHODS

Breathing patterns were recorded for 2- to 7-year-old children inhaling placebo from 4 different spacers/VHCs and were simulated by a flow generator. Drug delivery with different numbers of tidal breaths and with a single maximal breath was compared.

RESULTS

With tidal breathing, mean inhalation volumes were large, ranging from 384 mL to 445 mL. Mean values for drug delivery with an Aerochamber Plus (Trudell, London, Canada) were 40% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34%-46%) and 41% (95% CI: 36%-47%) of the total dose with 2 and 9 tidal breaths, respectively. Mean drug delivery values with these breath numbers with a Funhaler (Visiomed, Perth, Australia) were 39% (95% CI: 34%-43%) and 38% (95% CI: 35%-42%), respectively. With a Volumatic (GlaxoSmithKline, Melbourne, Australia), mean drug delivery values with 2 and 9 tidal breaths were 37% (95% CI: 33%-41%) and 43% (95% CI: 40%-46%), respectively (P = .02); there was no significant difference in drug delivery with 3 versus 9 tidal breaths. With the modified soft drink bottle, drug delivery. Drug delivery was not improved with a single maximal breath with any device.

CONCLUSION

For young children, tidal breaths through a spacer/VHC were much larger than expected. Two tidal breaths were adequate for small-volume VHCs and a 500-mL modified soft drink bottle, and 3 tidal breaths were adequate for the larger Volumatic VHC.

摘要

目的

确定从不同的储雾罐/活瓣式储雾器(VHC)吸入沙丁胺醇所需的呼吸次数。

方法

使用流量发生器记录 2-7 岁儿童吸入安慰剂时从 4 种不同的储雾罐/VHC 吸入的呼吸模式,并进行模拟。比较了不同潮气量呼吸次数和单次最大呼吸次数的药物输送情况。

结果

使用潮气量呼吸时,平均吸入量较大,范围为 384 至 445 毫升。使用 Aerochamber Plus(加拿大伦敦 Trudell)的药物输送平均值分别为 2 次和 9 次潮气量的 40%(95%置信区间 [CI]:34%-46%)和 41%(95% CI:36%-47%)。使用 Funhaler(澳大利亚珀斯 Visiomed)的这些呼吸次数的药物输送平均值分别为 39%(95% CI:34%-43%)和 38%(95% CI:35%-42%)。使用 Volumatic(澳大利亚墨尔本 GlaxoSmithKline),2 次和 9 次潮气量的药物输送平均值分别为 37%(95% CI:33%-41%)和 43%(95% CI:40%-46%)(P=0.02);使用 3 次潮气量和 9 次潮气量的药物输送没有显著差异。使用改良的软饮料瓶,药物输送. 任何设备都无法通过单次最大呼吸来改善药物输送。

结论

对于年幼的儿童,通过储雾罐/VHC 的潮气量呼吸明显大于预期。对于小容量的 VHC 和 500 毫升的改良软饮料瓶,2 次潮气量呼吸就足够了,而对于较大的 Volumatic VHC,则需要 3 次潮气量呼吸。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验