• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[感染性髋关节置换术的治疗。62例感染性全髋关节置换术的治疗结果]

[Treatment of infected hip joint arthroplasty. Results of treatment of 62 infected total prosthesis arthroplasties].

作者信息

Babst R, Jenny H, Morscher E

机构信息

Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Felix-Platter-Spital, Basel.

出版信息

Orthopade. 1989 Nov;18(6):517-26.

PMID:2608271
Abstract

The treatment of 62 cases of infected total joint arthroplasty of the hip is reported. The treatment regimen for each patient was dependent on the general medical condition of the patient and the clinical signs of infection, as well as the type of bacteria, the bony anchorage of the prosthesis and the bone stock of femur and acetabulum. Surgical treatment was one of the following: treatment of the infection leaving the prosthesis in situ; one-stage or two-stage revision arthroplasty; or excision arthroplasty (Girdlestone procedure). There were 11 early and 51 late infections. The commonest bacterium isolated was Staphylococcus epidermidis (30%). The primary success rate of revision of the shaft was somewhat better with cemented than with uncemented prostheses. The overall success rates for cemented and for uncemented shafts were similar (91.5% versus 90%).

摘要

本文报道了62例髋关节感染性全关节置换术的治疗情况。每位患者的治疗方案取决于患者的一般身体状况、感染的临床体征、细菌类型、假体的骨固定情况以及股骨和髋臼的骨量。手术治疗方式如下:保留假体原位治疗感染;一期或二期翻修关节成形术;或切除关节成形术(吉尔德斯通手术)。其中有11例早期感染和51例晚期感染。分离出的最常见细菌是表皮葡萄球菌(30%)。骨水泥型假体柄翻修的初步成功率略高于非骨水泥型假体柄。骨水泥型和非骨水泥型假体柄的总体成功率相似(分别为91.5%和90%)。

相似文献

1
[Treatment of infected hip joint arthroplasty. Results of treatment of 62 infected total prosthesis arthroplasties].[感染性髋关节置换术的治疗。62例感染性全髋关节置换术的治疗结果]
Orthopade. 1989 Nov;18(6):517-26.
2
[The infected total prosthesis].[感染的全关节假体]
Orthopade. 1989 Nov;18(6):527-32.
3
Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.使用模块化翻修假体MRP-TITAN翻修柄进行非骨水泥型股骨翻修关节成形术。
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2007 Mar;19(1):56-77. doi: 10.1007/s00064-007-1195-5.
4
[Treatment of infected total prosthesis arthroplasty of the hip joint].[髋关节感染性全髋关节置换术的治疗]
Orthopade. 1995 Aug;24(4):326-34.
5
Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.骨水泥会增加初次全髋关节置换术中感染的风险吗?在挪威关节置换登记处对56275例使用骨水泥和未使用骨水泥的初次全髋关节置换术进行了0至16年的随访,统计翻修率。
Acta Orthop. 2006 Jun;77(3):351-8. doi: 10.1080/17453670610046253.
6
[Two-stage reimplantation using spacers--the method of choice in treatment of hip joint prosthesis-related infections. Comparison with methods used from 1979 to 1998].[使用间隔物的两阶段再植入术——髋关节假体相关感染治疗的首选方法。与1979年至1998年使用的方法比较]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2003;70(1):17-24.
7
[Treatment of infected total hip endoprostheses].[感染性全髋关节假体的治疗]
Unfallchirurg. 1989 Jul;92(7):352-7.
8
Infected uncemented hip arthroplasty. Preserving the femoral stem with a two-stage revision procedure.感染性非骨水泥型髋关节置换术。采用两阶段翻修手术保留股骨柄。
Orthop Rev. 1989 Jun;18(6):707-12.
9
Cementless two-stage exchange arthroplasty for infection after total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术后感染的非骨水泥型二期翻修置换术。
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jan;22(1):72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.02.156.
10
Treatment of infected joint arthroplasty.感染性关节置换术的治疗。
Int Orthop. 1990;14(2):161-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00180122.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk factors for mortality following one-stage septic hip arthroplasty - a case-control study.一期感染性髋关节置换术后死亡的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
Int Orthop. 2022 Mar;46(3):507-513. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05230-y. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
2
[Revision of tumour endoprostheses around the knee joint. Review and own results].[膝关节周围肿瘤人工关节置换的翻修。综述与自身结果]
Orthopade. 2006 Feb;35(2):176-83. doi: 10.1007/s00132-005-0913-7.