Masri Bassam A, Panagiotopoulos Kostas P, Greidanus Nelson V, Garbuz Donald S, Duncan Clive P
Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jan;22(1):72-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.02.156.
We retrospectively reviewed all patients at one center with an infected total hip arthroplasty treated with 2-stage revision using cementless components for the second stage and the PROSTALAC articulated spacer at the first stage. Twenty-nine patients were reviewed and followed for at least 2 years postoperatively. An isolated Staphylococcus species was cultured in 76% (22/29) of patients. Three (10.3%) of 29 patients had recurrent infection at the site of the prosthesis. One of the 3 patients ultimately underwent a Girdlestone arthroplasty. Another patient was managed with irrigation and debridement, whereas the final patient was treated with intravenous antibiotics alone. Treatment of infection at the site of a hip arthroplasty with 2-stage revision using cementless components and an articulated spacer yields recurrence rates similar to revisions where at least one of the components at the second stage is fixed with antibiotic-loaded cement.
我们回顾性分析了某中心所有接受两阶段翻修治疗的感染性全髋关节置换患者,第二阶段使用非骨水泥型假体组件,第一阶段使用PROSTALAC活动型间隔器。共纳入29例患者,术后至少随访2年。76%(22/29)的患者培养出单一葡萄球菌属菌株。29例患者中有3例(10.3%)假体部位出现复发性感染。3例患者中的1例最终接受了Girdlestone关节成形术。另1例患者接受了冲洗清创治疗,而最后1例患者仅接受了静脉抗生素治疗。使用非骨水泥型假体组件和活动型间隔器进行两阶段翻修治疗髋关节置换部位感染的复发率,与第二阶段至少有一个组件使用含抗生素骨水泥固定的翻修治疗相似。