Conroy Elizabeth J, Harman Nicola L, Lane J Athene, Lewis Steff C, Murray Gordon, Norrie John, Sydes Matt R, Gamble Carrol
Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
Medicines for Children Research Network Clinical Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Clin Trials. 2015 Dec;12(6):664-76. doi: 10.1177/1740774515589959. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
The Medical Research Council Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice outlines a three-committee trial oversight structure--the day-to-day Trial Management Group, the Data Monitoring Committee and the Trial Steering Committee. In this model, the Trial Steering Committee is the executive committee that oversees the trial and considers the recommendations from the Data Monitoring Committee. There is yet to be in-depth consideration establishing the Trial Steering Committee's role and functionality.
A survey to establish Trial Steering Committee's current practices, role and the use and opinion on the Medical Research Council guidelines was undertaken within UK Clinical Research Collaborative registered Clinical Trials Units.
Completed surveys were obtained from 38 of 47 fully and partially registered Units. Individual items in the survey were analysed and reported spanning current Trial Steering Committee practices including its role, requirement and experience required for membership; methods to identify members; and meeting frequency. Terms (a document describing the committee's remit, objectives and functionality) were obtained and analysed from 21 of 33 Units with documents in place at their Unit. A total of 20 responders suggested aspects of the current Medical Research Council Guidelines that need improvement.
We present the first survey reporting on practices within UK Clinical Research Collaborative registered Clinical Trials Units on the experience and remits of Trial Steering Committees. We have identified a widespread adoption of Medical Research Council Guidelines for Trial Steering Committees in the United Kingdom, but limitations in this existing provision have been identified that need to be addressed.
医学研究理事会的《良好临床实践指南》概述了一个由三个委员会组成的试验监督结构——日常试验管理组、数据监测委员会和试验指导委员会。在这种模式下,试验指导委员会是负责监督试验并审议数据监测委员会建议的执行委员会。然而,对于试验指导委员会的角色和功能,尚未进行深入探讨。
在英国临床研究协作组织注册的临床试验单位内进行了一项调查,以确定试验指导委员会的现行做法、作用以及对医学研究理事会指南的使用情况和看法。
从47个完全或部分注册的单位中,有38个单位完成了调查。对调查中的各个项目进行了分析和报告,内容涵盖试验指导委员会的现行做法,包括其作用、成员要求和所需经验;确定成员的方法;以及会议频率。从33个有相关文件的单位中,有21个单位提供并分析了章程(一份描述委员会职责、目标和功能的文件)。共有20名受访者提出了现行医学研究理事会指南中需要改进的方面。
我们首次报告了关于英国临床研究协作组织注册的临床试验单位内试验指导委员会经验和职责的调查情况。我们发现英国广泛采用了医学研究理事会关于试验指导委员会的指南,但也发现了现有规定中的局限性,需要加以解决。