• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转移性结直肠癌的五年生存率及治疗费用:传统治疗方案与基于单克隆抗体的治疗方案对比

Five-year survival and costs of care in metastatic colorectal cancer: conventional versus monoclonal antibody-based treatment protocols.

作者信息

Kovacevic Aleksandra, Dragojevic-Simic Viktorija, Tarabar Dino, Rancic Nemanja, Jacimovic Nemanja, Katic Jelena, Dagovic Aleksandar, Jakovljevic Mihajlo

机构信息

Centre for Clinical Pharmacology, Military Medical Academy Medical Faculty, University of Defense, Belgrade, Serbia, Europe.

出版信息

Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015;15(8):963-70. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2015.1059280. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1586/14737140.2015.1059280
PMID:26089093
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the costs and survival estimates of metastatic colorectal carcinoma patients treated with conventional cytostatic protocols and adjuvant monoclonal antibodies (mAbs).

METHODS

Retrospective randomized case series and cost-of-illness analysis was used. Metastatic colorectal carcinoma cases (62) were randomly selected from the archive of the largest university military hospital in Southeastern Europe.

RESULTS

A 6-month longer survival was attributed to mAbs (p = 0.581). Conventional protocols incurred € 5137 (95% CI: € 3758-€ 6517) versus € 22,113 (95% CI: € 16,201-€ 28,025) total direct medical costs in mAb-based group. ICER of € 32,108 per life year gained attributable to mAbs three-fold exceeded informal willingness to pay threshold of Serbia.

CONCLUSION

mAbs adjuvant protocols had modest positive impact on 5-year survival rates. Costs were driven by targeted biologicals, but significantly higher costs of care were recorded in mAb-treated group in other domains, as well. More selective prescription and reimbursement criteria should be applied to increase cost-effectiveness of targeted oncology agents.

摘要

目的

评估采用传统细胞毒性方案和辅助单克隆抗体(mAb)治疗的转移性结直肠癌患者的成本和生存估计。

方法

采用回顾性随机病例系列和疾病成本分析。从东南欧最大的大学军事医院档案中随机选取62例转移性结直肠癌病例。

结果

mAb使生存期延长6个月(p = 0.581)。传统方案的总直接医疗成本为5137欧元(95%CI:3758欧元 - 6517欧元),而基于mAb的治疗组为22113欧元(95%CI:16201欧元 - 28025欧元)。mAb每延长一年生命的增量成本效果比为32108欧元,是塞尔维亚非正式支付意愿阈值的三倍。

结论

mAb辅助方案对5年生存率有适度的积极影响。成本由靶向生物制剂驱动,但在其他方面,mAb治疗组的护理成本也显著更高。应采用更具选择性的处方和报销标准,以提高靶向肿瘤药物的成本效益。

相似文献

1
Five-year survival and costs of care in metastatic colorectal cancer: conventional versus monoclonal antibody-based treatment protocols.转移性结直肠癌的五年生存率及治疗费用:传统治疗方案与基于单克隆抗体的治疗方案对比
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015;15(8):963-70. doi: 10.1586/14737140.2015.1059280. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.贝伐单抗联合化疗治疗日本转移性结直肠癌的成本效益分析。
Clin Ther. 2007 Oct;29(10):2256-67. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.10.013.
3
Cetuximab in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis.西妥昔单抗治疗转移性结直肠癌:基于模型的成本效益分析
J Chemother. 2006 Oct;18(5):532-7. doi: 10.1179/joc.2006.18.5.532.
4
Cost-effectiveness of targeted therapy with cetuximab in patients with K-ras wild-type colorectal cancer presenting with initially unresectable metastases limited to the liver in a German setting.在德国环境下,针对 K-ras 野生型结直肠癌患者肝内初始不可切除转移的靶向治疗药物西妥昔单抗的成本效益分析。
Clin Ther. 2011 Apr;33(4):482-97. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.04.010.
5
Costs differences among monoclonal antibodies-based first-line oncology cancer protocols for breast cancer, colorectal carcinoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.基于单克隆抗体的乳腺癌、结直肠癌和非霍奇金淋巴瘤一线肿瘤治疗方案的成本差异。
J BUON. 2014 Oct-Dec;19(4):1111-20.
6
Cetuximab for the treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.西妥昔单抗治疗复发性和/或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌。
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Oct;13 Suppl 3:49-54. doi: 10.3310/hta13suppl3/08.
7
Economic impact of simplified de Gramont regimen in first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.简化的德·格拉蒙方案在转移性结直肠癌一线治疗中的经济影响。
Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Jun;7(2):107-13. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0338-1.
8
A pharmacoeconomic modeling approach to estimate a value-based price for new oncology drugs in Europe.一种用于估算欧洲新型肿瘤药物基于价值的价格的药物经济学建模方法。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2012 Mar;18(1):57-67. doi: 10.1177/1078155210390724. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line chemotherapies in metastatic colorectal cancer. Results of the Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) 9601 randomized trial.转移性结直肠癌一线化疗的成本效益分析。法国消化肿瘤学联合会(FFCD)9601随机试验的结果。
Oncology. 2006;71(1-2):40-8. doi: 10.1159/000100448. Epub 2007 Mar 5.
10
[Cost-effectiveness of trastuzumab in the treatment of early stages breast cancer patients, in Portugal].[曲妥珠单抗治疗葡萄牙早期乳腺癌患者的成本效益分析]
Acta Med Port. 2010 May-Jun;23(3):475-82. Epub 2010 Jun 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome of Operated Colorectal Cancers in Relation to the Type of Initial Referral.接受手术的结直肠癌患者的预后与初始转诊类型的关系
Cureus. 2023 Mar 29;15(3):e36840. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36840. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Resource Oriented Decision Making for Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) in a Lower-Middle Income Country: Egyptian Foundation of Medical Sciences (EFMS) Consensus Recommendations 2020.低收入和中等收入国家转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)治疗的资源导向型决策:埃及医学科学基金会(EFMS)2020年共识建议
Cancer Manag Res. 2022 Feb 28;14:821-842. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S340030. eCollection 2022.
3
The Expiry of Humira Market Exclusivity and the Entry of Adalimumab Biosimilars in Europe: An Overview of Pricing and National Policy Measures.
修美乐市场独占期的到期及阿达木单抗生物类似药在欧洲的进入:定价与国家政策措施概述
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jan 8;11:591134. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.591134. eCollection 2020.
4
Oncological Diseases and Social Costs Considerations on Undertaken Health Policy Interventions.肿瘤疾病与社会成本:对所采取的卫生政策干预措施的思考。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 20;17(8):2837. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082837.
5
A Correlation Study of the Colorectal Cancer Statistics and Economic Indicators in Selected Balkan Countries.部分巴尔干国家结直肠癌统计数据与经济指标的相关性研究
Front Public Health. 2020 Feb 18;8:29. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00029. eCollection 2020.
6
Medical Cost of Colorectal Cancer Services in Serbia Between 2014 and 2017: National Data Report.2014年至2017年塞尔维亚结直肠癌服务的医疗成本:国家数据报告。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 May 15;10:526. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00526. eCollection 2019.
7
Colorectal cancer, screening and primary care: A mini literature review.结直肠癌、筛查和初级保健:小型文献综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep 7;23(33):6049-6058. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i33.6049.
8
Pharmaceutical Expenditure and Burden of Non-communicable Diseases in Serbia.塞尔维亚的药品支出与非传染性疾病负担
Front Pharmacol. 2016 Oct 13;7:373. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00373. eCollection 2016.