• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤患者的转运。

Transport of the trauma patient.

机构信息

London's Air Ambulance, The Helipad, Royal London Hospital, London E1 1BB, UK

East Anglian Air Ambulance, Cambridge Airport, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jul;115(1):33-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev159.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aev159
PMID:26089445
Abstract

The transport of the seriously injured patient is associated with risk and requires particular expertise and attention. The aim of this review is to provide a historical overview of transport services available to trauma patients in the UK, describe the various transport platforms that are used, identify risks from a system and disease perspective and how they may be mitigated, and make international comparisons. The transfer of patients requiring medical attention has developed over the years and now includes complex undertakings that undoubtedly confer a degree of risk on the patient. A number of different transport platforms are in regular use in the UK, and a number of different health-care professions of varying training, experience, and seniority undertake these transfers. The general principles are to provide no worse care en route than has been provided at the departure destination and to transport patients to a destination capable of delivering whichever intervention the patient is deemed to require. When deciding to transport an injured patient, there are risks, and appropriate mitigation must be in place, particularly if primary transfer to a major trauma centre involves bypassing a nearer facility. It is clear that those clinicians who undertake medical transfers must be appropriately trained and must have access to local or national guidelines. Medical transfers must be the subject of ongoing research, both to ensure that best practice is in place and to continue to understand the safest way of achieving essential transfers effectively.

摘要

严重创伤患者的转运存在风险,需要特别的专业知识和关注。本文旨在回顾英国创伤患者可获得的转运服务,描述所使用的各种转运平台,从系统和疾病角度识别风险及其可能的缓解措施,并进行国际比较。需要医疗关注的患者的转运多年来一直在发展,现在包括一些复杂的任务,这无疑给患者带来了一定程度的风险。英国目前有许多不同的转运平台,许多不同的医疗保健专业人员,具有不同的培训、经验和资历,负责这些转运。一般原则是在转运过程中提供不低于出发地的护理,并将患者转运到能够提供患者所需任何干预的目的地。决定转运创伤患者时存在风险,必须采取适当的缓解措施,特别是如果将受伤患者直接转运到主要创伤中心需要绕过较近的医疗机构。很明显,进行医疗转运的临床医生必须接受适当的培训,并且必须能够获得当地或国家的指南。医疗转运必须是持续研究的主题,既要确保实施最佳实践,也要继续了解实现必要转运的最安全方法。

相似文献

1
Transport of the trauma patient.创伤患者的转运。
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jul;115(1):33-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev159.
2
Emergency medical services (EMS) versus non-EMS transport among injured children in the United States.美国受伤儿童的紧急医疗服务(EMS)与非EMS转运情况对比
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;35(3):475-478. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.11.059. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
3
Guidelines for field triage of injured patients. Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage.受伤患者现场分诊指南。国家现场分诊专家小组的建议。
MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009 Jan 23;58(RR-1):1-35.
4
Comparison of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services Transport Types and Delays on Patient Outcomes at Two Level I Trauma Centers.两家一级创伤中心直升机紧急医疗服务运输类型及延误对患者预后的比较
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 May-Jun;21(3):327-333. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2016.1263371. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
5
Monitoring pre-hospital transport of severely injured patients in the Midland Region of New Zealand.新西兰中部地区重伤患者的院前转运监测
N Z Med J. 2018 Feb 23;131(1470):71-78.
6
Evaluation of the Implementation of the Trauma Triage and Destination Plan on the Field Triage of Injured Patients in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州创伤分诊与转运计划在受伤患者现场分诊中的实施评估
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):591-604. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1308606. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
7
Variations in pediatric trauma transfer patterns in Northern California pediatric trauma centers (2001-2009).北加利福尼亚州儿科创伤中心儿童创伤转运模式的变化(2001 - 2009年)
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;21(9):1023-30. doi: 10.1111/acem.12463.
8
Direct transport versus inter hospital transfer of severely injured trauma patients.重伤创伤患者的直接转运与医院间转运
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.020. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
9
Critical care transport: a trauma perspective.
Crit Care Clin. 1990 Jan;6(1):165-83.
10
The dynamics of prehospital/hospital care and modes of transport during civil conflict and terrorist incidents.冲突和恐怖事件中的院前/院内救治和转运模式的动态变化。
Public Health. 2017 Nov;152:108-116. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.07.029. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Practice of Pre-Hospital Emergency Care and Associated Factors in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study Design.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴的院前急救实践及相关因素:基于机构的横断面研究设计
Open Access Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 6;15:277-287. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S424814. eCollection 2023.
2
Transport of the patient with trauma: a narrative review.创伤患者的转运:叙述性综述。
Anaesthesia. 2022 Nov;77(11):1281-1287. doi: 10.1111/anae.15812. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
3
Developing a Low-resource Approach to Trauma Patient Care - Findings from a Nigerian Trauma Registry.
开发一种针对创伤患者护理的资源匮乏地区应对方法——来自尼日利亚创伤登记处的研究结果
Niger J Surg. 2021 Jan-Jun;27(1):9-15. doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_67_19. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
4
Perception of the healthcare professionals towards the current trauma and emergency care system in Kabul, Afghanistan: a mixed method study.阿富汗喀布尔的医疗保健专业人员对当前创伤和紧急护理系统的看法:混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 29;20(1):991. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05845-8.
5
Time to definitive care within major trauma networks in England.英格兰重大创伤网络内的确定性治疗时间。
BJS Open. 2020 Oct;4(5):963-969. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50316. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
6
Major trauma: What is important for the best outcome and survival?严重创伤:对于实现最佳治疗效果和生存而言,什么是重要的?
J Postgrad Med. 2017 Jul-Sep;63(3):149-150. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_752_16.