• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新西兰中部地区重伤患者的院前转运监测

Monitoring pre-hospital transport of severely injured patients in the Midland Region of New Zealand.

作者信息

Whitehead Jesse, Roskruge Matt, Tan Colin, Smith Alistair, Christey Grant

机构信息

Midland Trauma System, Waikato DHB, Hamilton.

School of Economics and Finance, Massey University, Auckland.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2018 Feb 23;131(1470):71-78.

PMID:29470474
Abstract

AIM

Pre-hospital triage strategies aim to identify the type and extent of patient injuries and ensure that they are transferred to the most appropriate trauma centres. Despite the importance of appropriate pre-hospital transport, there is little evidence base to assist medical staff on optimal destination policy for emergent pre-hospital transport. This paper explores the spatial relationship of patient transfers prior to the implementation of the Midland Pre-Hospital Trauma Destination Matrix in New Zealand, and is a retrospective view of practice against a destination policy that was applied after the study period.

METHODS

We use data obtained from the Midland Trauma Registry merged with Global Positioning System (GPS) data from St John and Land Information New Zealand Data Service on major trauma occurring in 2014 and 2015. Using ArcGIS, data were analysed for spatial relationships between factors associated with major trauma events and pre-hospital transportation.

RESULTS

In the retrospective analysis of 162 major trauma patients, 107 (66%) were transported to a hospital that matched the destination specified in the Matrix, and 55 (34%) were transported to a non-Matrix designated hospital.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-third of patients were not directly transported to the preferred definitive care hospital subsequently defined in the Midland Pre-Hospital Trauma Destination Matrix. Ongoing monitoring of the pre-hospital transportation system and the implementation of a formal pre-hospital transport policy may improve the efficiency of the Midland Trauma System. Future studies should examine the possible reasons for variations in triage decisions across the Midland Region.

摘要

目的

院前分诊策略旨在识别患者损伤的类型和程度,并确保他们被转运至最合适的创伤中心。尽管适当的院前转运很重要,但几乎没有证据基础可协助医护人员制定紧急院前转运的最佳目的地政策。本文探讨了新西兰实施中部地区院前创伤目的地矩阵之前患者转运的空间关系,并且是针对研究期后应用的目的地政策对实践的回顾性观察。

方法

我们使用从中部地区创伤登记处获得的数据,与圣约翰急救组织的全球定位系统(GPS)数据以及新西兰土地信息数据服务中心关于2014年和2015年发生的重大创伤的数据合并。使用ArcGIS分析与重大创伤事件和院前运输相关因素之间的空间关系。

结果

在对162例重大创伤患者的回顾性分析中,107例(66%)被转运至与矩阵中指定目的地相符的医院,55例(34%)被转运至非矩阵指定的医院。

结论

约三分之一的患者未被直接转运至随后在中部地区院前创伤目的地矩阵中确定的首选确定性治疗医院。对院前运输系统进行持续监测并实施正式的院前运输政策可能会提高中部地区创伤系统的效率。未来的研究应检查中部地区分诊决策差异的可能原因。

相似文献

1
Monitoring pre-hospital transport of severely injured patients in the Midland Region of New Zealand.新西兰中部地区重伤患者的院前转运监测
N Z Med J. 2018 Feb 23;131(1470):71-78.
2
Evaluation of the Implementation of the Trauma Triage and Destination Plan on the Field Triage of Injured Patients in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州创伤分诊与转运计划在受伤患者现场分诊中的实施评估
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017 Sep-Oct;21(5):591-604. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2017.1308606. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
3
Advancing age and trauma: triage destination compliance and mortality in Victoria, Australia.老龄化与创伤:澳大利亚维多利亚州的分诊目的地依从性与死亡率
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1312-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.02.028. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
4
Adherence to New Zealand's Major Trauma Destination Policy: an audit of current practice.新西兰主要创伤目的地政策的遵从情况:当前实践的审计。
N Z Med J. 2024 Sep 27;137(1603):89-128. doi: 10.26635/6965.6594.
5
Adherence with the pre-hospital triage protocol in the transport of injured patients in an urban setting.在城市环境中,运送受伤患者时遵循院前分诊协议的情况。
Injury. 2012 Sep;43(9):1368-76. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.019. Epub 2011 Nov 5.
6
The mortality benefit of direct trauma center transport in a regional trauma system: a population-based analysis.区域创伤系统中直接创伤中心转运的生存获益:一项基于人群的分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jun;72(6):1510-5; discussion 1515-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318252510a.
7
Does destination make a difference? Outcomes after a policy change affecting cutoff times for prehospital transport.目的地有影响吗?一项影响院前转运截止时间的政策变化后的结果。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2024 Sep 1;97(3):429-433. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004245. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
8
Direct transport versus inter hospital transfer of severely injured trauma patients.重伤创伤患者的直接转运与医院间转运
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.020. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
9
Emergency medical services (EMS) versus non-EMS transport among injured children in the United States.美国受伤儿童的紧急医疗服务(EMS)与非EMS转运情况对比
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;35(3):475-478. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.11.059. Epub 2016 Nov 30.
10
Differentiation of confirmed major trauma patients and potential major trauma patients using pre-hospital trauma triage criteria.使用院前创伤分诊标准对确诊的严重创伤患者和潜在的严重创伤患者进行区分。
Injury. 2011 Sep;42(9):889-95. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.03.035. Epub 2010 Apr 28.