Suppr超能文献

两种捕捉方法对肉鸡损伤发生情况的影响。

Influence of two catching methods on the occurrence of lesions in broilers.

作者信息

Langkabel Nina, Baumann Maximilian P O, Feiler Annika, Sanguankiat Arsooth, Fries Reinhard

机构信息

Institute of Meat Hygiene and Technology, Panel Veterinary Public Health, FAO Reference Centre for VPH, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Freie Universität Berlin, Brümmerstr. 10, 14195 Berlin

Institute of Meat Hygiene and Technology, Panel Veterinary Public Health, FAO Reference Centre for VPH, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Freie Universität Berlin, Brümmerstr. 10, 14195 Berlin.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2015 Aug;94(8):1735-41. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev164. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

Abstract

During the catching of broilers for slaughter, 2 to 3 birds are grabbed per hand at one leg at the same time. From an animal welfare point of view, this procedure is under critical observation from animal welfare administration and the general public.In this paper 2 catching methods were compared: the routinely used 1-leg catching method, and a second tech-nique whereby birds were grabbed by both legs with a maximum of 2 birds per hand (2-leg catching method). Lesions on the body, legs, and wings (hemorrhages and fractures) were recorded by a camera system located after the plucking position. Two weight classes, 2 catching teams, and 2 flocks were included in the study.Heavy animals showed more lesions than birds of the light weight class. In all investigations, lesions on the body and legs were rare, whereas wing lesions occurred at a rate of up to 15.32%. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the 2 methods or between the catching teams for both weight classes. A correlation between lesions and weight was observed, with a significant odds ratio ( OR: ) of 3.6 (95% CI: 3.299-3.957).During 2-leg catching, the animals appeared to be more restless. Workers stated that the grabbing of both legs of a bird was more difficult and that working in a crouching position for a longer time was harder.We conclude that the cautious handling of animals to reduce stress is more important than "holding animals by both legs", as has been proposed.

摘要

在抓肉鸡进行屠宰时,每只手同时抓住一只腿上的2至3只鸡。从动物福利的角度来看,这一过程受到动物福利管理部门和公众的密切关注。本文比较了两种抓鸡方法:常规使用的单腿抓鸡法,以及另一种技术,即每只手最多抓2只鸡的双腿抓鸡法(双腿抓鸡法)。通过位于拔毛位置之后的摄像系统记录鸡身体、腿部和翅膀上的损伤(出血和骨折)。研究纳入了两个体重等级、两个抓鸡小组和两个鸡群。较重的鸡比轻体重等级的鸡出现更多损伤。在所有调查中,身体和腿部的损伤很少见,而翅膀损伤发生率高达15.32%。统计分析表明,两种方法之间以及两个抓鸡小组在两个体重等级上均无显著差异。观察到损伤与体重之间存在相关性,显著优势比(OR:)为3.6(95%置信区间:3.299 - 3.957)。在双腿抓鸡过程中,鸡似乎更不安。工作人员表示,抓住鸡的双腿更困难,长时间蹲姿工作更辛苦。我们得出结论,如有人所提议的那样,谨慎处理动物以减轻压力比“抓住动物的双腿”更为重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验