• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种捕捉方法对肉鸡损伤发生情况的影响。

Influence of two catching methods on the occurrence of lesions in broilers.

作者信息

Langkabel Nina, Baumann Maximilian P O, Feiler Annika, Sanguankiat Arsooth, Fries Reinhard

机构信息

Institute of Meat Hygiene and Technology, Panel Veterinary Public Health, FAO Reference Centre for VPH, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Freie Universität Berlin, Brümmerstr. 10, 14195 Berlin

Institute of Meat Hygiene and Technology, Panel Veterinary Public Health, FAO Reference Centre for VPH, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine Freie Universität Berlin, Brümmerstr. 10, 14195 Berlin.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2015 Aug;94(8):1735-41. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev164. Epub 2015 Jun 18.

DOI:10.3382/ps/pev164
PMID:26089477
Abstract

During the catching of broilers for slaughter, 2 to 3 birds are grabbed per hand at one leg at the same time. From an animal welfare point of view, this procedure is under critical observation from animal welfare administration and the general public.In this paper 2 catching methods were compared: the routinely used 1-leg catching method, and a second tech-nique whereby birds were grabbed by both legs with a maximum of 2 birds per hand (2-leg catching method). Lesions on the body, legs, and wings (hemorrhages and fractures) were recorded by a camera system located after the plucking position. Two weight classes, 2 catching teams, and 2 flocks were included in the study.Heavy animals showed more lesions than birds of the light weight class. In all investigations, lesions on the body and legs were rare, whereas wing lesions occurred at a rate of up to 15.32%. Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between the 2 methods or between the catching teams for both weight classes. A correlation between lesions and weight was observed, with a significant odds ratio ( OR: ) of 3.6 (95% CI: 3.299-3.957).During 2-leg catching, the animals appeared to be more restless. Workers stated that the grabbing of both legs of a bird was more difficult and that working in a crouching position for a longer time was harder.We conclude that the cautious handling of animals to reduce stress is more important than "holding animals by both legs", as has been proposed.

摘要

在抓肉鸡进行屠宰时,每只手同时抓住一只腿上的2至3只鸡。从动物福利的角度来看,这一过程受到动物福利管理部门和公众的密切关注。本文比较了两种抓鸡方法:常规使用的单腿抓鸡法,以及另一种技术,即每只手最多抓2只鸡的双腿抓鸡法(双腿抓鸡法)。通过位于拔毛位置之后的摄像系统记录鸡身体、腿部和翅膀上的损伤(出血和骨折)。研究纳入了两个体重等级、两个抓鸡小组和两个鸡群。较重的鸡比轻体重等级的鸡出现更多损伤。在所有调查中,身体和腿部的损伤很少见,而翅膀损伤发生率高达15.32%。统计分析表明,两种方法之间以及两个抓鸡小组在两个体重等级上均无显著差异。观察到损伤与体重之间存在相关性,显著优势比(OR:)为3.6(95%置信区间:3.299 - 3.957)。在双腿抓鸡过程中,鸡似乎更不安。工作人员表示,抓住鸡的双腿更困难,长时间蹲姿工作更辛苦。我们得出结论,如有人所提议的那样,谨慎处理动物以减轻压力比“抓住动物的双腿”更为重要。

相似文献

1
Influence of two catching methods on the occurrence of lesions in broilers.两种捕捉方法对肉鸡损伤发生情况的影响。
Poult Sci. 2015 Aug;94(8):1735-41. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev164. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
2
Effect of different catching practices during manual upright handling on broiler welfare and behavior.人工直立体位操作中不同捕捉方式对肉鸡福利和行为的影响。
Poult Sci. 2019 Oct 1;98(10):4282-4289. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez284.
3
Impact of the separate pre-slaughter stages on broiler chicken welfare.屠宰前各阶段对肉鸡福利的影响。
Poult Sci. 2017 Feb 1;96(2):266-273. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew361. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
4
Effect of catching method and lighting intensity on the prevalence of broken bones and on the ease of handling of end-of-lay hens.捕捉方法和光照强度对产蛋末期母鸡骨折发生率及处理难易程度的影响。
Vet Rec. 1993 Feb 6;132(6):127-9. doi: 10.1136/vr.132.6.127.
5
An Evaluation of Two Different Broiler Catching Methods.两种不同肉鸡捕捉方法的评估
Animals (Basel). 2018 Aug 15;8(8):141. doi: 10.3390/ani8080141.
6
Impact of mechanical vs. manual catching on stress, fear, and carcass quality in slower growing broilers.机械捕捉与人工捕捉对生长较慢的肉鸡的应激、恐惧和胴体品质的影响。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2025 Apr-Jun;28(2):222-229. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2023.2254226. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
7
The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions.机械和手动抓鸡以及现场装笼条件对福利的影响。
Poult Sci. 2020 Nov;99(11):5233-5251. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.030. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
8
Effects of season, catching method, and thinning on carcass quality and production parameters in 4 different broiler production systems in the Netherlands.荷兰 4 种不同肉鸡生产体系中季节、捕捉方法和去势对胴体质量和生产参数的影响。
Poult Sci. 2024 Jun;103(6):103688. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.103688. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
9
Investigation of palpation as a method for determining the prevalence of keel and furculum damage in laying hens.对触诊作为确定蛋鸡龙骨和叉骨损伤患病率方法的调查。
Vet Rec. 2004 Oct 30;155(18):547-9. doi: 10.1136/vr.155.18.547.
10
Associations between carcass weight uniformity and production measures on farm and at slaughter in commercial broiler flocks.商品肉鸡群在农场和屠宰场的胴体重量均匀度与生产措施之间的关系。
Poult Sci. 2019 Oct 1;98(10):4261-4268. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez252.

引用本文的文献

1
Loading-related injuries of mechanically loaded broilers under field conditions.田间条件下机械装载肉鸡的负荷相关损伤
Poult Sci. 2025 Aug;104(8):105297. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105297. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Comparing methods for catching and crating broiler chicken flocks: A trade-off between animal welfare, ergonomics and economics.比较捕捉和装笼肉鸡群的方法:动物福利、人体工程学与经济学之间的权衡。
Poult Sci. 2025 Feb;104(2):104704. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104704. Epub 2024 Dec 30.
3
Poultry Preslaughter Operations in Hot Environments: The Present Knowledge and the Next Steps Forward.
炎热环境下家禽屠宰前的操作:现有知识及未来前进方向
Animals (Basel). 2024 Oct 4;14(19):2865. doi: 10.3390/ani14192865.
4
Preslaughter handling factors affecting dead on arrival, condemnations, and bruising in broiler chickens raised without an antibiotic program.宰前处理因素对无抗生素饲养肉鸡的到厂即死、淘汰和瘀伤的影响。
Poult Sci. 2023 Aug;102(8):102828. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102828. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
5
Welfare of broilers on farm.农场中肉鸡的福利。
EFSA J. 2023 Feb 21;21(2):e07788. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7788. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Welfare of domestic birds and rabbits transported in containers.用容器运输的家禽和家兔的福利。
EFSA J. 2022 Sep 7;20(9):e07441. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7441. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Traumatic Injuries Detected during Post-Mortem Slaughterhouse Inspection as Welfare Indicators in Poultry and Rabbits.在宰后屠宰场检查中检测到的创伤性损伤作为家禽和兔子福利指标
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 6;11(9):2610. doi: 10.3390/ani11092610.
8
Impact of pre-slaughter factors on welfare of broilers.宰前因素对肉鸡福利的影响。
Vet Anim Sci. 2020 Oct 1;10:100146. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2020.100146. eCollection 2020 Dec.
9
The welfare impacts of mechanical and manual broiler catching and of circumstances at loading under field conditions.机械和手动抓鸡以及现场装笼条件对福利的影响。
Poult Sci. 2020 Nov;99(11):5233-5251. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.08.030. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
10
An IoT Platform Towards the Enhancement of Poultry Production Chains.面向家禽养殖链增强的物联网平台。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 11;20(6):1549. doi: 10.3390/s20061549.