Suppr超能文献

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)的“两日午夜”规则:政策与现实相悖。

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) two midnight rule: policy at odds with reality.

作者信息

Huntington Ciara R, Blair Laurel J, Cox Tiffany C, Prasad Tanushree, Kercher Kent W, Augenstein Vedra A, Heniford B Todd

机构信息

Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):751-755. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4271-1. Epub 2015 Jun 20.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To reduce costs, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented new policies governing which patients are automatically admitted as inpatients (staying greater than "two midnights") and which require additional justification with physician documentation to be admitted. This study examines procedures missing from the Medicare Inpatient Only (MIO) list and uses national data to evaluate its appropriateness.

METHODS

Non-MIO procedures were identified from the current MIO list. Utilizing relevant billing codes, procedures were queried in the National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database for length of stay (LOS), percentage requiring >2 day stay, and inpatient status from 2005 to 2012. In addition, a separate analysis was performed for patients 65 years old or older who would qualify for Medicare.

RESULTS

A majority of patients stayed more than 2 days for several procedures not included on the MIO list (% staying >2 days, mean LOS), including component separation (79.1%, 5.9 ± 12.3 days), diagnostic laparoscopy (64.2%, 5.5 ± 11.9 days), laparoscopic splenectomy (60.0%, 9.0 ± 13.6 days), open recurrent ventral hernia repair (58.2%, 6.3 ± 9.0 days), laparoscopic esophageal surgery (46.4%, 5.3 ± 13.3 days), and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (24.7%, 2.5 ± 8.8 days). In patients ≥65 years, the average LOS was longer than the general population; for example, 40.2% of laparoscopic appendectomies and 38.7% of laparoscopic cholecystectomies in this older group required more than two nights in the hospital. In 92.3% of procedures examined, patients ≥65 years required greater than two nights in the hospital with an average LOS of 2.5-10.7 days.

CONCLUSION

Commonly encountered non-MIO surgical procedures have national precedents for inpatient status. Before enacting policy, CMS and other regulatory bodies should consider current data to ensure rules are evidence-based and applicable.

摘要

引言

为降低成本,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)实施了新政策,规定哪些患者自动被收治为住院患者(住院时间超过“两个午夜”),哪些患者需要医生提供额外证明文件才能收治。本研究调查了“仅医疗保险住院”(MIO)清单中遗漏的手术,并使用全国数据评估其合理性。

方法

从当前的MIO清单中识别出非MIO手术。利用相关计费代码,在国家手术质量改进计划数据库中查询2005年至2012年期间这些手术的住院时间(LOS)、需要住院超过2天的百分比以及住院状态。此外,对符合医疗保险资格的65岁及以上患者进行了单独分析。

结果

对于MIO清单未涵盖的几种手术,大多数患者住院时间超过2天(住院超过2天的百分比,平均LOS),包括组织分离术(79.1%,5.9±12.3天)、诊断性腹腔镜检查(64.2%,5.5±11.9天)、腹腔镜脾切除术(60.0%,9.0±13.6天)、开放性复发性腹疝修补术(58.2%,6.3±9.0天)、腹腔镜食管手术(46.4%,5.3±13.3天)和腹腔镜腹疝修补术(24.7%,2.5±8.8天)。在65岁及以上的患者中,平均住院时间比普通人群更长;例如,该老年组中40.2%的腹腔镜阑尾切除术和38.7%的腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者需要住院超过两个夜晚。在92.3%的检查手术中,65岁及以上患者需要住院超过两个夜晚,平均住院时间为2.5 - 10.7天。

结论

常见的非MIO外科手术有住院状态的全国先例。在制定政策之前,CMS和其他监管机构应考虑当前数据,以确保规则基于证据且适用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验