Sui Yilun, Chen Qianqian, Sun Xiaoxi
Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics and IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China.
Shanghai Ji Ai Genetics and IVF Institute, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China; Key Laboratory of Female Reproductive Endocrine Related Diseases, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200011, China.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 Aug;31(2):140-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.05.007. Epub 2015 May 19.
Evidence of an association between skewed X chromosome inactivation (SXCI) and idiopathic recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) is conflicting. No consensus has been reached on the degree of SXCI and the number of pregnancy losses in patients who have experienced RSA. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, different degrees of skewing and definitions of RSA are used to establish an association between SXCI and idiopathic RSA. Twelve studies comprising 1594 women who had experienced RSA and 1924 controls were included. No significant association was found between SXCI and RSA when 80 or 90% was used as cut-off value of skewing; more stringent 95% or greater SXCI was significantly higher in women who had experienced RSA than in controls (odds ratio [OR] = 4.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.46 to 12.46). A significantly higher incidence of SXCI when defined as greater than 90% (or ≥90%) was found in women who had experienced RSA with three or more pregnancy losses (OR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.41, 3.78); significance diminished when RSA was defined as two or more losses. Extreme skewing of SXCI is associated with idiopathic RSA with three or more losses. More studies are needed to validate the potential genetic mechanism.
X染色体失活偏倚(SXCI)与特发性复发性自然流产(RSA)之间关联的证据存在矛盾。对于经历过RSA的患者,SXCI的程度与妊娠丢失的数量尚未达成共识。在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,采用不同程度的偏倚和RSA的定义来确定SXCI与特发性RSA之间的关联。纳入了12项研究,包括1594例经历过RSA的女性和1924例对照。当将80%或90%用作偏倚的截断值时,未发现SXCI与RSA之间存在显著关联;在经历过RSA的女性中,更为严格的95%或更高的SXCI显著高于对照组(优势比[OR]=4.27,95%置信区间[CI]为1.46至12.46)。在经历过三次或更多次妊娠丢失的RSA女性中,当将SXCI定义为大于90%(或≥90%)时,SXCI的发生率显著更高(OR=2.31,95%CI为1.41,3.78);当将RSA定义为两次或更多次丢失时,显著性降低。SXCI的极端偏倚与三次或更多次丢失的特发性RSA相关。需要更多研究来验证潜在的遗传机制。