Rezaei Asghar, Dragomir-Daescu Dan
Division of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA.
J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Dec;30(12):2200-6. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2572. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
Although a large number of studies have addressed the age-related changes in bone mineral density (BMD), there is a paucity of data for the assessment of femoral strength loss with age in both genders. We determined the variation of strength with age in femurs of women and men by mechanical tests on a cohort of 100 cadaveric femurs. In addition, the age-related neck BMD loss in our cadaveric cohort was found to be similar with BMD loss of four published population-based studies. Given the strong correlation found in our cadaveric study between BMD and femoral strength, we also estimated the femoral strength of the four populations based on their reported neck BMDs. Our study showed that men's femurs in our cadaveric cohort were stronger than women's femurs by about 800 N at the same BMD level, and by 1750 N at the same age. The strength differences were not explained satisfactorily by the size difference between men's and women's bones. Similar to the findings of clinical studies, the BMD values of men at all ages were larger than that of women. The age-related loss rates in BMD and strength were not statistically different between the two genders of our cadaveric cohort. After normalization, strength decreased more than 40% faster than BMD. On average, men reached a certain BMD value about 16 years later than women, and for strength about 23 years later, which may explain the higher rate of hip fracture in postmenopausal women. In patient population cohorts men reached a similar BMD value about 16 to 25 years later than women, whereas for estimated strength, sometimes more than 40 years later.
尽管大量研究探讨了骨矿物质密度(BMD)与年龄相关的变化,但关于评估男女股骨强度随年龄下降的数据却很匮乏。我们通过对100具尸体股骨进行力学测试,确定了男女股骨强度随年龄的变化情况。此外,我们发现尸体队列中与年龄相关的颈部骨密度损失与四项已发表的基于人群的研究中的骨密度损失相似。鉴于我们在尸体研究中发现骨密度与股骨强度之间存在很强的相关性,我们还根据四项人群报告的颈部骨密度估计了他们的股骨强度。我们的研究表明,在相同骨密度水平下,我们尸体队列中的男性股骨比女性股骨强约800牛,在同一年龄时强1750牛。强度差异不能通过男女骨骼大小差异得到满意解释。与临床研究结果相似,各年龄段男性的骨密度值均高于女性。我们尸体队列中两性的骨密度和强度与年龄相关的损失率在统计学上没有差异。归一化后,强度下降速度比骨密度快40%以上。平均而言,男性达到一定骨密度值的时间比女性晚约16年,达到一定强度的时间比女性晚约23年,这可能解释了绝经后女性髋部骨折发生率较高的原因。在患者人群队列中,男性达到相似骨密度值的时间比女性晚约16至25年,而对于估计强度,有时晚40多年。