Cohen Wess A, Ballard Tiffany N S, Hamill Jennifer B, Kim Hyungjin M, Chen Xiaoxue, Klassen Anne, Wilkins Edwin G, Pusic Andrea L
From the *Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; †Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI; ‡Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; and §McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Aug;77(2):237-41. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000550.
Optimizing the patient experience is a central pillar in healthcare quality. Although this may be recognized as important in breast reconstruction, surgeons are often unaware of how well they and members of their team achieve this goal. The objective of our study was to evaluate patient satisfaction with the experience of care in a multicenter, prospective cohort of patients undergoing breast reconstruction. Specifically, we sought to determine which aspects of the care experience might be most amenable to quality improvement.
As part of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study, 2093 patients were recruited from 11 centers in North America. Of these, 1534 (73.3%) completed the BREAST-Q Satisfaction with Care scales (satisfaction with information, surgeon, medical team, and office staff) at 3 months after reconstruction and were included in the analysis.
Patients scored lowest on 'Satisfaction with Information' (mean = 72.8) compared to all other Satisfaction with Care scales (mean, 89.5-95.5). Patients with immediate reconstruction were less satisfied with their plastic surgeon compared to those with delayed reconstruction. The racial category, "Other" (Asians, Pacific Islanders, Hawaiians, American Indians), was the least satisfied group across all Satisfaction with Care scales.
Patients undergoing breast reconstruction perceive significant gaps in their knowledge and understanding of expected outcomes. Immediate reconstruction patients and minority racial groups may require additional resources and attention. As a means to improve quality of care, these findings highlight an important unmet need and suggest that improving patient education may be central to providing patient-centered care.
优化患者体验是医疗质量的核心支柱。尽管这在乳房重建中被认为很重要,但外科医生往往不清楚他们自己以及团队成员在实现这一目标方面的表现如何。我们研究的目的是评估多中心前瞻性队列中接受乳房重建患者对护理体验的满意度。具体而言,我们试图确定护理体验的哪些方面最适合进行质量改进。
作为乳房切除术后重建结果联盟研究的一部分,从北美11个中心招募了2093名患者。其中,1534名(73.3%)在重建后3个月完成了BREAST-Q护理满意度量表(对信息、外科医生、医疗团队和办公室工作人员的满意度)并纳入分析。
与所有其他护理满意度量表(均值为89.5 - 95.5)相比,患者在“信息满意度”方面得分最低(均值 = 72.8)。与延迟重建的患者相比,即刻重建的患者对整形外科医生的满意度较低。在所有护理满意度量表中,“其他”种族类别(亚洲人、太平洋岛民、夏威夷人、美洲印第安人)是最不满意的群体。
接受乳房重建的患者在对预期结果的了解和认识方面存在明显差距。即刻重建患者和少数种族群体可能需要额外的资源和关注。作为提高护理质量的一种手段,这些发现凸显了一个重要的未满足需求,并表明改善患者教育可能是提供以患者为中心的护理的核心。