• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血液系统恶性肿瘤的高药价合理吗?批判性分析。

Are high drug prices for hematologic malignancies justified? A critical analysis.

作者信息

Chhatwal Jagpreet, Mathisen Michael, Kantarjian Hagop

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

Epocrates Medical Information, AthenaHealth, San Francisco, California.

出版信息

Cancer. 2015 Oct 1;121(19):3372-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29512. Epub 2015 Jun 23.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.29512
PMID:26102457
Abstract

In the past 15 years, treatment outcomes for hematologic malignancies have improved substantially. However, drug prices have also increased drastically. This commentary examines the value of the treatment of hematologic malignancies at current prices in the United States through a reanalysis of a systematic review evaluating 29 studies of 9 treatments for 4 hematologic malignancies. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated on the basis of drug prices in the United States in 2014. Sixty-three percent of the studies (15 of 24) had ICERs higher than $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), the benchmark widely used by health economists to define cost-effectiveness. In studies evaluating the current standard-of-care treatments for chronic myeloid leukemia, the ICERs for tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus hydroxyurea or interferon ranged from $210,000 to $426,000/QALY. The lower ICER values were mostly obtained from 11 studies evaluating rituximab, which was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1997 (ICER range, $37,000-$69,000/QALY). In conclusion, the costs of the majority of new treatments for hematologic cancers are too high to be deemed cost-effective in the United States.

摘要

在过去15年中,血液系统恶性肿瘤的治疗效果有了显著改善。然而,药品价格也急剧上涨。本评论通过重新分析一项系统评价来审视美国当前价格下血液系统恶性肿瘤治疗的价值,该系统评价评估了针对4种血液系统恶性肿瘤的9种治疗方法的29项研究。增量成本效益比(ICER)是根据2014年美国的药品价格计算得出的。63%的研究(24项中的15项)的ICER高于每质量调整生命年(QALY)50,000美元,这是卫生经济学家广泛用于定义成本效益的基准。在评估慢性髓性白血病当前标准治疗方法的研究中,酪氨酸激酶抑制剂与羟基脲或干扰素相比的ICER为每QALY 210,000美元至426,000美元。较低的ICER值大多来自11项评估利妥昔单抗的研究,该药物于1997年获得美国食品药品监督管理局批准(ICER范围为每QALY 37,000美元至69,000美元)。总之,在美国,大多数血液系统癌症新治疗方法的成本过高,难以被视为具有成本效益。

相似文献

1
Are high drug prices for hematologic malignancies justified? A critical analysis.血液系统恶性肿瘤的高药价合理吗?批判性分析。
Cancer. 2015 Oct 1;121(19):3372-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29512. Epub 2015 Jun 23.
2
[Cost-effectiveness analysis in the treatment of hematologic malignancies].
Rinsho Ketsueki. 2024;65(9):1190-1198. doi: 10.11406/rinketsu.65.1190.
3
Value of innovation in hematologic malignancies: a systematic review of published cost-effectiveness analyses.血液系统恶性肿瘤创新的价值:已发表的成本效益分析的系统评价
Blood. 2015 Mar 19;125(12):1866-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-07-592832. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
4
Economic evaluation of intensive chemotherapy with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for patients with high-risk early breast cancer in Japan.日本高危早期乳腺癌患者强化化疗联合预防性粒细胞集落刺激因子的经济学评价。
Clin Ther. 2010 Feb;32(2):311-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.01.029.
5
Necitumumab in Metastatic Squamous Cell Lung Cancer: Establishing a Value-Based Cost.尼妥珠单抗治疗转移性鳞状非小细胞肺癌:建立基于价值的成本核算。
JAMA Oncol. 2015 Dec;1(9):1293-300. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3316.
6
Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in patients with type 2 diabetes on oral anti-diabetes drugs: cost-effectiveness in France, Germany, Italy, and Spain.口服降糖药治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的自我血糖监测(SMBG):法国、德国、意大利和西班牙的成本效益。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Jan;26(1):163-75. doi: 10.1185/03007990903429765.
7
Value of innovation for hematologic malignancies.
J Med Econ. 2016;19(5):487-9. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1133429. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
8
Adjusting for Drug Wastage in Economic Evaluations of New Therapies for Hematologic Malignancies: A Systematic Review.血液系统恶性肿瘤新疗法经济评估中药物浪费的调整:一项系统评价
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Apr;12(4):e369-79. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.005876. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
9
[Hematologic malignancies and health economics].
Rinsho Ketsueki. 2020;61(7):725-733. doi: 10.11406/rinketsu.61.725.
10
Cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia or Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.载脂蛋白 B 代谢途径抑制剂治疗杂合子型家族性高胆固醇血症或动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者的成本效果分析。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 16;316(7):743-53. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11004.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute myeloid leukemia management and research in 2025.2025年急性髓系白血病的管理与研究
CA Cancer J Clin. 2025 Jan-Feb;75(1):46-67. doi: 10.3322/caac.21873. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
2
Outcome of Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia in the United States since the introduction of imatinib therapy-The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, 2000-2019.自伊马替尼治疗问世以来美国费城染色体阳性慢性髓性白血病的结局:监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库,2000-2019 年。
Cancer. 2023 Dec 1;129(23):3805-3814. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35038. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
3
Career disruption and limitation of financial earnings due to cancer.
癌症导致的职业中断和经济收入受限。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2023 Jul 3;7(4). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkad044.
4
Inequality in Drug Utilization among Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia Patients in Malaysia: A Cost-Utility Analysis.马来西亚慢性髓性白血病患者药物利用的不平等:成本效用分析。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Dec 1;23(12):4253-4260. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.12.4253.
5
Financial burden among cancer patients: A national-level perspective.癌症患者的经济负担:国家层面的视角。
Cancer Med. 2023 Feb;12(4):4638-4646. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5049. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
6
Health-related quality of life using EQ-5D among chronic myeloid leukaemia patients in health centres in Klang Valley, Malaysia.马来西亚雪兰莪巴生谷地区健康中心慢性髓性白血病患者的 EQ-5D 健康相关生活质量。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 27;16(8):e0256804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256804. eCollection 2021.
7
Value Frameworks: Adaptation of Korean Versions of Value Frameworks for Oncology.价值框架:肿瘤学中韩国版价值框架的适应性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 18;18(6):3139. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063139.
8
Long-Term Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Multiple Myeloma Treatment Strategies for Elderly Transplant-Ineligible Patients in Serbia.塞尔维亚老年不适宜移植的多发性骨髓瘤治疗策略的长期有效性和成本效益
Zdr Varst. 2020 Apr 6;59(2):83-91. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2020-0011. eCollection 2020 Jun.
9
Medical Care Costs Associated with Cancer Survivorship in the United States.美国癌症生存者相关的医疗保健费用。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020 Jul;29(7):1304-1312. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1534. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
10
Managing chronic myeloid leukemia for treatment-free remission: a proposal from the GIMEMA CML WP.管理无治疗缓解的慢性髓性白血病:来自 GIMEMA CML WP 的建议。
Blood Adv. 2019 Dec 23;3(24):4280-4290. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000865.