Suppr超能文献

医用大麻素:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Cannabinoids for Medical Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom2The National Institute for Health Research Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West at University Hospitals, Bristol NHS Foundation Trust.

Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, Escrick, York, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JAMA. 2015;313(24):2456-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6358.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Cannabis and cannabinoid drugs are widely used to treat disease or alleviate symptoms, but their efficacy for specific indications is not clear.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a systematic review of the benefits and adverse events (AEs) of cannabinoids.

DATA SOURCES

Twenty-eight databases from inception to April 2015.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials of cannabinoids for the following indications: nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, appetite stimulation in HIV/AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity due to multiple sclerosis or paraplegia, depression, anxiety disorder, sleep disorder, psychosis, glaucoma, or Tourette syndrome.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. All review stages were conducted independently by 2 reviewers. Where possible, data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Patient-relevant/disease-specific outcomes, activities of daily living, quality of life, global impression of change, and AEs.

RESULTS

A total of 79 trials (6462 participants) were included; 4 were judged at low risk of bias. Most trials showed improvement in symptoms associated with cannabinoids but these associations did not reach statistical significance in all trials. Compared with placebo, cannabinoids were associated with a greater average number of patients showing a complete nausea and vomiting response (47% vs 20%; odds ratio [OR], 3.82 [95% CI, 1.55-9.42]; 3 trials), reduction in pain (37% vs 31%; OR, 1.41 [95% CI, 0.99-2.00]; 8 trials), a greater average reduction in numerical rating scale pain assessment (on a 0-10-point scale; weighted mean difference [WMD], -0.46 [95% CI, -0.80 to -0.11]; 6 trials), and average reduction in the Ashworth spasticity scale (WMD, -0.36 [95% CI, -0.69 to -0.05]; 7 trials). There was an increased risk of short-term AEs with cannabinoids, including serious AEs. Common AEs included dizziness, dry mouth, nausea, fatigue, somnolence, euphoria, vomiting, disorientation, drowsiness, confusion, loss of balance, and hallucination.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There was moderate-quality evidence to support the use of cannabinoids for the treatment of chronic pain and spasticity. There was low-quality evidence suggesting that cannabinoids were associated with improvements in nausea and vomiting due to chemotherapy, weight gain in HIV infection, sleep disorders, and Tourette syndrome. Cannabinoids were associated with an increased risk of short-term AEs.

摘要

重要性

大麻和大麻素类药物被广泛用于治疗疾病或减轻症状,但它们对特定适应症的疗效尚不清楚。

目的

对大麻素的益处和不良事件(AE)进行系统评价。

数据来源

从创建到 2015 年 4 月的 28 个数据库。

研究选择

大麻素治疗以下适应症的随机临床试验:化疗引起的恶心和呕吐、艾滋病毒/艾滋病的食欲刺激、慢性疼痛、多发性硬化症或截瘫引起的痉挛、抑郁症、焦虑症、睡眠障碍、精神病、青光眼或妥瑞氏综合征。

数据提取和综合

使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。所有审查阶段均由 2 名审查员独立进行。在可能的情况下,使用随机效应荟萃分析对数据进行汇总。

主要结果和措施

患者相关/疾病特异性结局、日常生活活动、生活质量、总体变化印象和 AE。

结果

共纳入 79 项试验(6462 名参与者);其中 4 项被评为低偏倚风险。大多数试验显示出与大麻素相关的症状改善,但并非所有试验均达到统计学意义。与安慰剂相比,大麻素与更多的患者出现完全恶心和呕吐反应相关(47%对 20%;优势比[OR],3.82[95%CI,1.55-9.42];3 项试验)、疼痛减轻(37%对 31%;OR,1.41[95%CI,0.99-2.00];8 项试验)、数字评分量表疼痛评估平均降低(0-10 分;加权均数差[WMD],-0.46[95%CI,-0.80 至-0.11];6 项试验)和 Ashworth 痉挛量表的平均降低(WMD,-0.36[95%CI,-0.69 至-0.05];7 项试验)。大麻素治疗与短期 AE 风险增加有关,包括严重 AE。常见的 AE 包括头晕、口干、恶心、疲劳、嗜睡、欣快、呕吐、定向障碍、嗜睡、混乱、失去平衡和幻觉。

结论和相关性

有中等质量证据支持大麻素治疗慢性疼痛和痉挛。有低质量证据表明,大麻素与化疗引起的恶心和呕吐、艾滋病毒感染时的体重增加、睡眠障碍和妥瑞氏综合征的改善有关。大麻素与短期 AE 风险增加有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验