Suppr超能文献

采用TomoEdge技术的加速断层放射治疗递送

Accelerated tomotherapy delivery with TomoEdge technique.

作者信息

Katayama Sonja, Haefner Matthias F, Mohr Angela, Schubert Kai, Oetzel Dieter, Debus Juergen, Sterzing Florian

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Mar 8;16(2):4964. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.4964.

Abstract

TomoEDGE is an advanced delivery form of tomotherapy which uses a dynamic secondary collimator. This plan comparison study describes the new features, their clinical applicability, and their effect on plan quality and treatment speed. For the first 45 patients worldwide that were scheduled for a treatment with TomoEdge, at least two plans were created: one with the previous "standard"mode with static jaws and 2.5 cm field width (Reg 2.5) and one with TomoEdge technique and 5 cm field width (Edge 5). If, after analysis in terms of beam on time, integral dose, dose conformity, and organ at risk sparing the treating physician decided that the Edge 5 plan was not suitable for clinical treatment, a plan with TomoEdge and 2.5 cm field width was created (Edge 2.5) and used for the treatment. Among the 45 cases, 30 were suitable for Edge 5 treatment, including treatments of the head and neck, rectal cancer, anal cancer, malignancies of the chest, breast cancer, and palliative treatments. In these cases, the use of a 5 cm field width reduced beam on time by more than 30% without compromising plan quality. The 5 cm beam could not be clinically applied to treatments of the pelvic lymph nodes for prostate cancer and to head and neck irradiations with extensive involvement of the skull, as dose to critical organs at risk such as bladder (average dose 28 Gy vs. 29 Gy, Reg 2.5 vs. Edge 5), small bowel (29% vs. 31%, Reg 2.5 vs. Edge 5) and brain (average dose partial brain 19 Gy vs. 21 Gy, Reg 2.5 vs. Edge 5) increased to a clinically relevant, yet not statistically significant, amount. TomoEdge is an advantageous extension of the tomotherapy technique that can speed up treatments and thus increase patient comfort and safety in the majority of clinical settings.

摘要

TomoEDGE是螺旋断层放疗的一种先进的放疗形式,它采用了动态二级准直器。本计划对比研究描述了其新特性、临床适用性以及对计划质量和治疗速度的影响。对于全球范围内计划接受TomoEDGE治疗的前45例患者,至少制定了两个计划:一个采用先前的“标准”模式,即静态准直器和2.5厘米射野宽度(Reg 2.5),另一个采用TomoEDGE技术和5厘米射野宽度(Edge 5)。如果在对治疗时间、积分剂量、剂量适形度和危及器官保护进行分析后,治疗医师认为Edge 5计划不适合临床治疗,则制定一个射野宽度为2.5厘米的TomoEDGE计划(Edge 2.5)并用于治疗。在这45例病例中,30例适合采用Edge 5治疗,包括头颈部、直肠癌、肛管癌、胸部恶性肿瘤、乳腺癌的治疗以及姑息治疗。在这些病例中,使用5厘米射野宽度可使治疗时间减少30%以上,且不影响计划质量。5厘米射野宽度在临床上不适用于前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结的治疗以及颅骨广泛受累的头颈部照射,因为膀胱(平均剂量28 Gy对29 Gy,Reg 2.5对Edge 5)、小肠(29%对31%,Reg 2.5对Edge 5)和脑(部分脑平均剂量19 Gy对21 Gy,Reg 2.5对Edge 5)等危及关键器官的剂量增加到了具有临床意义但无统计学显著性差异的水平。TomoEDGE是螺旋断层放疗技术的一个有利扩展,可加快治疗速度,从而在大多数临床情况下提高患者的舒适度和安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/09b6/5690089/f7df145d97d5/ACM2-16-033-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Accelerated tomotherapy delivery with TomoEdge technique.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Mar 8;16(2):4964. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.4964.
2
Implementation of TomoEDGE in the independent dose calculator CheckTomo.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Mar;18(2):92-99. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12048. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
3
Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Jul 7;52(13):3817-36. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/13/011. Epub 2007 May 31.
4
Comparison of plan quality provided by intensity-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Sep 1;69(1):240-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.073.
9
Dynamic tomotherapy delivery.
Med Phys. 2011 Jun;38(6):3013-24. doi: 10.1118/1.3584198.

引用本文的文献

5
Plan comparison of prostate stereotactic radiotherapy in spacer implant patients.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021 Sep;22(9):280-288. doi: 10.1002/acm2.13387. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
6
Comparison of treatment planning approaches for spatially fractionated irradiation of deep tumors.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jun;20(6):125-133. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12617. Epub 2019 May 21.
7
Accuracy of TomoEDGE dynamic jaw field widths.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018 Sep;19(5):761-766. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12418. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
10
Analysis of modulation factor to shorten the delivery time in helical tomotherapy.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 May;18(3):83-87. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12075. Epub 2017 Apr 26.

本文引用的文献

1
The potential of helical tomotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancer.
Oncologist. 2013 Jun;18(6):697-706. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0424. Epub 2013 May 30.
2
Outcome and toxicity using helical tomotherapy for craniospinal irradiation in pediatric medulloblastoma.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2014 Jan;16(1):96-101. doi: 10.1007/s12094-013-1048-7. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
3
Tomotherapy radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations--current possibilities and future options with helical tomotherapy dynamic jaws?
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Oct;12(5):421-8. doi: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500335. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
5
Accelerated large volume irradiation with dynamic Jaw/Dynamic Couch Helical Tomotherapy.
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Nov 12;7:191. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-191.
7
Searching standard parameters for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of prostate cancer.
Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jul 11;7:108. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-108.
9
Comparing planning time, delivery time and plan quality for IMRT, RapidArc and Tomotherapy.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2009 Oct 7;10(4):117-131. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v10i4.3068.
10
Dynamic jaws and dynamic couch in helical tomotherapy.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 15;76(4):1266-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1686. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验