• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从早期职业护士学者身上获得的领导力见解:一项混合方法研究的结果。

Insights on leadership from early career nurse academics: findings from a mixed methods study.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

Oxford Brookes University & Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford UK & School of Health, University of New England, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Nurs Manag. 2016 Mar;24(2):E155-63. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12317. Epub 2015 Jun 24.

DOI:10.1111/jonm.12317
PMID:26104063
Abstract

AIM

To explore the perceptions of early career nursing academics on leadership in academia.

BACKGROUND

There is growing emphasis on leadership capacity building across all domains of nursing. However, there is limited evidence on leadership capacity in early career academics. This study tested an intervention to develop leadership capacity amongst early career nursing academics in two Australian universities.

METHODS

A sequential mixed methods design, using online surveys and semi-structured interviews, was used to collect data.

RESULTS

Twenty-three early career nursing academics participated. Most had experience of formal leadership roles and were aware of its importance to them as they developed their academic careers. Participants were able to discuss their own views of themselves as leaders; their perceptions of their own needs for leadership development, and ways in which they could seek to develop further as leaders.

CONCLUSION

There is a need to provide initial and ongoing opportunities for leadership development amongst nurse academics. These opportunities should be contextualised and recognise factors such as gender, and the effects of structural oppression.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT

Nurse academics are involved in the preparation of the next generation of clinical leaders and it is imperative that they are able to articulate a clear view of leadership.

摘要

目的

探讨初任护理学术人员对学术界领导力的看法。

背景

护理领域对领导能力建设的重视程度日益提高。然而,关于初任学术人员领导力能力的证据有限。本研究在澳大利亚的两所大学测试了一项针对初任护理学术人员领导力能力发展的干预措施。

方法

采用在线调查和半结构化访谈的顺序混合方法设计收集数据。

结果

23 名初任护理学术人员参与了研究。大多数人都有正式领导角色的经验,并意识到领导力对他们发展学术生涯的重要性。参与者能够讨论自己作为领导者的看法;他们对自己领导力发展需求的看法,以及他们可以寻求进一步发展领导力的方式。

结论

有必要为护理学术人员提供领导力发展的初始和持续机会。这些机会应该是背景化的,并认识到性别等因素以及结构压迫的影响。

对护理管理的意义

护理学术人员参与培养下一代临床领导者,他们必须能够清晰地表达对领导力的看法。

相似文献

1
Insights on leadership from early career nurse academics: findings from a mixed methods study.从早期职业护士学者身上获得的领导力见解:一项混合方法研究的结果。
J Nurs Manag. 2016 Mar;24(2):E155-63. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12317. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
2
Combining clinical practice and academic work in nursing: A qualitative study about perceived importance, facilitators and barriers regarding clinical academic careers for nurses in university hospitals.将临床实践与护理学术工作相结合:一项关于大学医院护士临床学术职业感知重要性、促进因素和障碍的定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4973-4984. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13996. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
3
A foot in two camps: an exploratory study of nurse leaders in universities.脚踏两个阵营:对大学护理领导者的探索性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Nov;33(11):1342-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Mar 15.
4
Exploring the experiences of early career academic nurses as they shape their career journey: A qualitative study.探索早期职业学术护士在塑造职业旅程时的体验:一项定性研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 May;76:68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.01.021. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
5
Academic nurses' transition across an academic career: A qualitative study.学术护士在学术生涯中的转型:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Apr;80(4):1630-1637. doi: 10.1111/jan.15928. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
6
How do nurse academics value and engage with evidence-based practice across Australia: Findings from a grounded theory study.澳大利亚的护士学者如何看待循证实践并参与其中:基于扎根理论研究的结果
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jun;41:54-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
7
Nurse educator academic incivility: a qualitative descriptive study.护士教育者学术不端行为:一项定性描述性研究。
Int Nurs Rev. 2020 Sep;67(3):411-419. doi: 10.1111/inr.12610. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
8
Walking alongside: a qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of academic nurse mentors supporting early career nurse academics.并肩同行:对支持初入职场的护士学者的学术护士导师的经历和看法的定性研究
Contemp Nurse. 2015;51(1):69-82. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2015.1081256. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
9
Florence Nightingale's legacy for clinical academics: A framework analysis of a clinical professorial network and a model for clinical academia.弗洛伦斯·南丁格尔对临床学者的遗产:临床教授网络的框架分析及临床学术模型。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Feb;31(3-4):353-361. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15756. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
10
Mental health lived experience academics in tertiary education: the views of nurse academics.高等教育中具有心理健康生活经历的学者:护理学学者的观点。
Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Jan;35(1):113-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Organisational Strategies for Women Nurses to Advance in Healthcare Leadership: A Systematic Review.女性护士在医疗保健领导力方面取得进步的组织策略:一项系统综述
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Dec 7;2023:2678916. doi: 10.1155/2023/2678916. eCollection 2023.
2
Stories of being a new nurse academic at a nursing education institution.作为一名新的护理教育机构的护理学术人员的故事。
Nurs Open. 2023 Jun;10(6):3586-3595. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1601. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
3
Using a Modified Delphi Approach and Nominal Group Technique for Organisational Priority Setting of Evidence-Based Interventions That Advance Women in Healthcare Leadership.
采用改良德尔菲法和名义群体技术对促进女性医疗保健领导力的循证干预措施进行组织优先级排序。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 17;19(22):15202. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215202.
4
Leadership of PhD-prepared nurses working in hospitals and its influence on career development: A qualitative study.医院中具有博士学历护士的领导力及其对职业发展的影响:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Dec;31(23-24):3414-3427. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16168. Epub 2021 Dec 12.
5
Advancing women in healthcare leadership: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of multi-sector evidence on organisational interventions.提升女性在医疗保健领域的领导力:关于组织干预措施的多部门证据的系统评价与元综合分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Aug 12;39:101084. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101084. eCollection 2021 Sep.