Suppr超能文献

颅内狭窄的支架置入术:当前争议与未来方向

Stenting in Intracranial Stenosis: Current Controversies and Future Directions.

作者信息

Chatterjee Arindam R, Derdeyn Colin P

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Suite 210, 96 Jonathan Lucas St., Charleston, SC, 29425, USA,

出版信息

Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2015 Aug;17(8):48. doi: 10.1007/s11883-015-0527-4.

Abstract

Angioplasty and stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) are a last resort for patients with high-grade intracranial stenosis with multiple ischemic events unresponsive to medical therapy. Medical management, consisting of aggressive risk factor control and dual antiplatelet therapy, is superior to angioplasty and stenting for the prevention of future stroke. Future studies of angioplasty and stenting in this population are important, as the stroke risk on medical therapy is 12 % at 1 year and post-procedure stroke rates are similar to rates with medical treatment. There are many issues that will need to be resolved for stenting to offer any benefit, however. Procedural risks of hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke are unacceptably high. High-risk subgroups, potentially based on hemodynamic factors, will need to be identified for future interventional trials. Nevertheless, it is still reasonable to consider angioplasty and stenting for selected patients with multiple recurrent events despite aggressive medical management, but benefits are unclear at this time.

摘要

对于颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(ICAS)患者,血管成形术和支架置入术是针对药物治疗无效的重度颅内狭窄且发生多次缺血事件患者的最后手段。由积极的危险因素控制和双重抗血小板治疗组成的药物治疗,在预防未来卒中方面优于血管成形术和支架置入术。针对该人群进行血管成形术和支架置入术的未来研究很重要,因为药物治疗1年时的卒中风险为12%,术后卒中发生率与药物治疗相似。然而,要使支架置入术带来任何益处,仍有许多问题需要解决。出血性和缺血性卒中的手术风险高得令人无法接受。未来的介入试验需要识别出可能基于血流动力学因素的高危亚组。尽管如此,对于尽管积极进行药物治疗仍有多次复发事件的特定患者,考虑血管成形术和支架置入术仍是合理的,但目前益处尚不清楚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验