Suppr超能文献

老年患者中与Perceval无缝合主动脉瓣置换相关的血小板减少症:需谨慎对待。

Thrombocytopenia associated with Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: a word of caution.

作者信息

Albacker Turki B

机构信息

King Fahad Cardiac Center, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh.

出版信息

Heart Surg Forum. 2015 Jun 26;18(3):E093-7. doi: 10.1532/hsf.1324.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to report for the first time the phenomenon of thrombocytopenia associated with the use of sutureless aortic valve replacements (AVR), and try to find an explanation for its occurrence.

METHODS

The data was collected retrospectively for all patients who had sutureless AVR (7 patients) and was compared to patients who underwent sutured AVR (22 patients) by the same surgeon between February 2012 and November 2013.

RESULTS

Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp durations were shorter in the sutureless group (96.4 min, 70.6 min) compared to the sutured group (128.3 min, 97.3 min), (P = .04, P = .003) respectively. Mean transvalvular gradients were lower in the sutureless group (mean = 9.6 mmHg) compared to the sutured group (mean = 17.3 mmHg). Platelet levels were significantly lower in the Perceval patients compared to the Enable patients and sutured valves. Platelet transfusion was higher for sutureless valves (6.5 units versus 5.4 units for the sutured group, P = .63), especially the Perceval valve (7.6 units versus 5.3 for the Enable valve, P = .35), but was not statistically significant. Packed red blood cells (PRBCs) transfusion was significantly higher in the sutureless group (6 units versus 3.1 for the sutured group, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

The implantation of sutureless aortic valves, especially the Perceval valve, was associated with a significant drop in platelet count postoperatively with slow recovery and higher PRBCs transfusion requirements. Extreme caution should be taken before the routine use of these valves in elderly patients who are already at risk of thrombocytopenia postoperatively.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在首次报告与使用无缝合主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)相关的血小板减少现象,并试图找出其发生原因。

方法

回顾性收集2012年2月至2013年11月间接受无缝合AVR的所有患者(7例)的数据,并与同一位外科医生进行的有缝合AVR患者(22例)的数据进行比较。

结果

与有缝合组(128.3分钟,97.3分钟)相比,无缝合组的体外循环和主动脉阻断时间更短(分别为96.4分钟,70.6分钟),(P = 0.04,P = 0.003)。无缝合组的平均跨瓣压差低于有缝合组(平均 = 9.6 mmHg)(平均 = 17.3 mmHg)。与使用Enable瓣膜和有缝合瓣膜的患者相比,使用Perceval瓣膜的患者血小板水平显著降低。无缝合瓣膜的血小板输注量更高(6.5单位,有缝合组为5.4单位,P = 0.63),尤其是Perceval瓣膜(7.6单位,Enable瓣膜为5.3单位,P = 0.35),但差异无统计学意义。无缝合组的浓缩红细胞(PRBCs)输注量显著更高(6单位,有缝合组为3.1单位,P = 0.002)。

结论

无缝合主动脉瓣的植入,尤其是Perceval瓣膜,与术后血小板计数显著下降、恢复缓慢以及更高的PRBCs输注需求相关。在老年患者中,对于术后本就有血小板减少风险的患者,在常规使用这些瓣膜之前应格外谨慎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验