Suppr超能文献

使用两种不同尺寸的覆膜支架对斯坦福B型主动脉夹层进行血管腔内修复。

Endovascular repair of Stanford B aortic dissection using two stent grafts with different sizes.

作者信息

Huang Xiaoyong, Huang Lianjun, Sun Lizhong, Xu Shangdong, Xue Yuguo, Zeng Qinglong, Guo Xi, Peng Mingliang

机构信息

Department of Intervention, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Intervention, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jul;62(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.02.022.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to introduce a novel strategy for thoracic endovascular aortic repair of Stanford B aortic dissection using two-stent graft implantation (TSI), in which the proximal stent and distal stent with different sizes are sequentially deployed, and to summarize our experience with this technique.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of 72 consecutive patients (61 men; mean age, 55 ± 7 years; range, 41-67 years) with Stanford type B aortic dissection who underwent TSI treatment between January 2012 and May 2013. Among all patients, 43 (59.7%) involved the infrarenal aorta and 29 (40.3%) involved the whole thoracic and abdominal aorta; mean aortic involvement length was 226 ± 13 mm (range, 182-312 mm). Eight cases were for acute dissection (within 2 weeks from onset of symptoms), 11 cases were for chronic dissection (>3 months after initial dissection), and 53 cases were for subacute dissection (between 2 weeks and 3 months). Twenty-two cases (30.6%) were uncomplicated type and 50 cases (69.4%) were complicated type. Follow-up was performed postoperatively at 1 month, 6 months, and yearly thereafter. Technique success, aorta morphology, and procedure-related complications were evaluated.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 100%; 72 pairs of stent grafts (144 thoracic stent grafts) and 10 left subclavian artery chimney stents were used. The mean aortic length coverage by the stent grafts was 197.6 ± 20.3 mm, and mean taper diameter span was 7.5 ± 1.8 mm. All patients were followed up from 6 to 16 months (mean, 10 ± 4 months); 95.8% (69 of 72) had a thrombosed false lumen in the aortic coverage, and the true lumen expanded on average 57% ± 11% (23%-100%). No significant changes were found in aortic diameters of the proximal and distal ends of the two stent grafts and the angles between centerlines of the distal end of the stent and the aorta during follow-up. Procedure-related complications included transient paraplegia (coverage of the left subclavian artery without revascularization and extensive coverage of aorta >220 mm) due to acute spinal cord ischemia (n = 1) and malapposition of the distal stent (primary tear closed, true lumen expansion led to oversize rate insufficient in distal stent diameter; n = 1). No death or malperfusion complications were observed during the perioperative period and follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term outcomes showed TSI to be a flexible and effective approach to accurately repair Stanford B aortic dissection that could potentially address the limitations of currently available stent grafts. Further prospective clinical studies are warranted to evaluate its long-term efficacy.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是介绍一种使用双支架植入术(TSI)对斯坦福B型主动脉夹层进行胸主动脉腔内修复的新策略,即依次部署不同尺寸的近端支架和远端支架,并总结我们在该技术方面的经验。

方法

对2012年1月至2013年5月期间接受TSI治疗的72例连续的斯坦福B型主动脉夹层患者(61例男性;平均年龄55±7岁;范围41 - 67岁)进行回顾性研究。在所有患者中,43例(59.7%)累及肾下腹主动脉,29例(40.3%)累及整个胸主动脉和腹主动脉;平均主动脉受累长度为226±13mm(范围182 - 312mm)。8例为急性夹层(症状发作后2周内),11例为慢性夹层(初次夹层后>3个月),53例为亚急性夹层(2周与3个月之间)。22例(30.6%)为无并发症类型,50例(69.4%)为有并发症类型。术后分别于1个月、6个月及此后每年进行随访。评估技术成功率、主动脉形态及与手术相关的并发症。

结果

技术成功率达100%;使用了72对支架移植物(144个胸段支架移植物)和10个左锁骨下动脉烟囱式支架。支架移植物平均主动脉长度覆盖为197.6±20.3mm,平均锥度直径跨度为7.5±1.8mm。所有患者随访6至16个月(平均10±4个月);95.8%(72例中的69例)主动脉覆盖区域内假腔血栓形成,真腔平均扩张57%±11%(23% - 100%)。随访期间,两个支架移植物近端和远端的主动脉直径以及支架远端中心线与主动脉之间的角度均未发现明显变化。与手术相关的并发症包括因急性脊髓缺血导致的短暂性截瘫(未进行血运重建的左锁骨下动脉覆盖及主动脉广泛覆盖>220mm;n = 1)和远端支架贴壁不良(原发破口闭合,真腔扩张导致远端支架直径过大率不足;n = 1)。围手术期及随访期间未观察到死亡或灌注不良并发症。

结论

短期结果显示TSI是一种灵活有效的方法,可准确修复斯坦福B型主动脉夹层,可能解决现有支架移植物的局限性。有必要进行进一步的前瞻性临床研究以评估其长期疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验