Johnson Maxine, Baxter Susan, Blank Lindsay, Cantrell Anna, Brumfitt Shelagh, Enderby Pam, Goyder Elizabeth
School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Department of Human Communication Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Jan;51(1):3-17. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12182. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
A range of interventions have been developed to treat stuttering in recent years. The effectiveness of these interventions has largely been assessed in studies focusing on the impact of specific types of therapy on patient outcomes. Relatively little is known about the factors that influence how the delivery and impact of different types of intervention may be experienced from the perspective of both people who deliver as well as those who receive interventions.
To synthesize the available evidence in relation to factors that might enhance or mitigate against successful outcomes following interventions for stuttering by identifying and synthesizing relevant qualitative research that explored the experiences of people delivering and receiving interventions that aim to improve fluency.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: We carried out a systematic review including research that had used in-depth interviews and focus groups and conducted a substantive qualitative analysis of the data collected. Included study populations were either adults or children affected by a diagnosed stutter and/or providers of therapy for stuttering. An iterative approach was used to search for published qualitative evidence in relevant databases from 1990 to 2014. Retrieved citations were sifted for relevance and the data from articles that met the inclusion criteria were extracted. Each included paper was assessed for quality and a thematic analysis and synthesis of findings was carried out.
Synthesized qualitative evidence highlights the changing experiences for people who stutter both historically and, for individuals, over the life course. Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of interventions for stuttering are encountered at the individual, intervention, interpersonal and social levels. Interventions may be particularly pertinent at certain transition points in the life course. Attention to emotional as well as practical aspects of stuttering is valued by people receiving therapy. The client-therapist relationship and support from others are also key factors in achieving successful outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS: A synthesis of qualitative findings from published papers has added to the effectiveness data reported in an accompanying paper in understanding how stuttering impacts on people across the life course. Evidence suggests that a client-centred and individually tailored approach enhances the likelihood of successful intervention outcomes through attention to emotional, situational and practical needs.
近年来已开发出一系列治疗口吃的干预措施。这些干预措施的有效性在很大程度上是在关注特定类型治疗对患者结局影响的研究中进行评估的。对于从干预实施者和接受者的角度来看,影响不同类型干预的实施方式和效果的因素,我们了解得相对较少。
通过识别和综合探索旨在改善流畅性的干预措施实施者和接受者经历的相关定性研究,综合与口吃干预后可能增强或阻碍成功结局的因素相关的现有证据。
我们进行了一项系统综述,包括使用深入访谈和焦点小组的研究,并对收集到的数据进行了实质性的定性分析。纳入的研究人群为受诊断口吃影响的成年人或儿童和/或口吃治疗提供者。采用迭代方法在1990年至2014年的相关数据库中搜索已发表的定性证据。对检索到的文献进行相关性筛选,并提取符合纳入标准的文章中的数据。对每篇纳入的论文进行质量评估,并对研究结果进行主题分析和综合。
综合定性证据突出了口吃者在历史上以及个体在生命历程中的经历变化。口吃干预实施的障碍和促进因素在个体、干预、人际和社会层面都会遇到。干预措施在生命历程的某些过渡点可能特别相关。接受治疗的人重视对口吃情感和实际方面的关注。客户与治疗师的关系以及他人的支持也是取得成功结局的关键因素。
已发表论文的定性研究结果综合,在理解口吃如何在生命历程中影响人们方面,补充了随附论文中报告的有效性数据。证据表明,以客户为中心且量身定制的方法通过关注情感、情境和实际需求,提高了成功干预结局的可能性。