Dyer Bryce T J, Sewell Philip, Noroozi Siamak
a School of Design, Engineering & Computing , Bournemouth University , Bournemouth , UK.
Assist Technol. 2014 Fall;26(3):157-63. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2014.888599.
Two energy return prosthesis are subjected to three different statically applied loading methods. This initial study proposes that statically applied loading to a sport prosthesis using several controlled methods were statistically robust enough to derive a mechanical stiffness value. However, any predicted stiffness is drawn into question when allowing any movement of the distal end. This uncertainty will make any evaluation or prescription of lower limb prosthesis technology based upon their stiffness incorrect. In addition, the peak calculated stiffness at the expected bodyweight induced ground impact load of a runner is judged the most representative assessment method. This study attempts to build on previous research advocating the need to monitor the performance of prosthesis lower limb technology in disability sport.
两种能量回馈假肢承受三种不同的静态加载方法。这项初步研究表明,使用几种受控方法对运动假肢进行静态加载在统计学上足够可靠,能够得出机械刚度值。然而,当允许远端有任何移动时,任何预测的刚度都受到质疑。这种不确定性将使基于刚度的下肢假肢技术的任何评估或处方都不正确。此外,在跑步者预期体重引起的地面冲击载荷下计算出的峰值刚度被判定为最具代表性的评估方法。本研究试图在先前研究的基础上,提倡有必要监测残疾人运动中假肢下肢技术的性能。