Inokuchi Ryota, Sato Hajime, Iwagami Masao, Komaru Yohei, Iwai Satoshi, Gunshin Masataka, Nakamura Kensuke, Shinohara Kazuaki, Kitsuta Yoichi, Nakajima Susumu, Yahagi Naoki
From the Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Bunkyo-ku (RI, YK, SI, MG, KN, YK, SN, NY); Department of General and Emergency Medicine, JR Tokyo General Hospital, Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo (RI, YK, SI); Department of Health Policy and Technology Assessment, National Institute of Public Health, Wako, Saitama, Japan (HS); London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Bloomsbury, London, UK (MI); and Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Ohta Nishinouchi Hospital, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan (KS).
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Jul;94(26):e856. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000856.
Recording information in emergency departments (EDs) constitutes a major obstacle to efficient treatment. A new electronic medical records (EMR) system focusing on clinical documentation was developed to accelerate patient flow. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of a new EMR system on ED length of stay and physician satisfaction.We integrated a new EMR system at a hospital already using a standard system. A crossover design was adopted whereby residents were randomized into 2 groups. Group A used the existing EMR system first, followed by the newly developed system, for 2 weeks each. Group B followed the opposite sequence. The time required to provide overall medical care, length of stay in ED, and degree of physician satisfaction were compared between the 2 EMR systems.The study involved 6 residents and 526 patients (277 assessed using the standard system and 249 assessed with the new system). Mean time for clinical documentation decreased from 133.7 ± 5.1 minutes to 107.5 ± 5.4 minutes with the new EMR system (P < 0.001). The time for overall medical care was significantly reduced in all patient groups except triage level 5 (nonurgent). The new EMR system significantly reduced the length of stay in ED for triage level 2 (emergency) patients (145.4 ± 13.6 minutes vs 184.3 ± 13.6 minutes for standard system; P = 0.047). As for the degree of physician satisfaction, there was a high degree of satisfaction in terms of the physical findings support system and the ability to capture images and enter negative findings.The new EMR system shortened the time for overall medical care and was associated with a high degree of resident satisfaction.
在急诊科记录信息是高效治疗的一大障碍。为加快患者流转,开发了一种专注于临床文档记录的新型电子病历(EMR)系统。本研究旨在考察新型EMR系统对急诊科住院时间和医生满意度的影响。我们在一家已使用标准系统的医院集成了新型EMR系统。采用交叉设计,将住院医师随机分为两组。A组先使用现有的EMR系统,之后使用新开发的系统,每组各使用2周。B组则采用相反的顺序。比较了两种EMR系统在提供整体医疗护理所需时间、急诊科住院时间以及医生满意度方面的差异。该研究纳入了6名住院医师和526例患者(277例使用标准系统评估,249例使用新系统评估)。使用新型EMR系统时,临床文档记录的平均时间从133.7±5.1分钟降至107.5±5.4分钟(P<0.001)。除5级分诊(非紧急)患者组外,所有患者组的整体医疗护理时间均显著减少。新型EMR系统显著缩短了2级分诊(紧急)患者在急诊科的住院时间(标准系统为184.3±13.6分钟,新型EMR系统为145.4±13.6分钟;P = 0.047)。在医生满意度方面,体格检查支持系统、图像采集能力和阴性结果录入方面的满意度较高。新型EMR系统缩短了整体医疗护理时间,并与住院医师的高度满意度相关。