Suppr超能文献

局部晚期直肠癌单纯新辅助化疗的综述

Review of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Alone in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

作者信息

Jalil Omer, Claydon Leica, Arulampalam Tan

机构信息

Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, Colchester Hospital University, Turner Road, Colchester, CO4 5JL, UK,

出版信息

J Gastrointest Cancer. 2015 Sep;46(3):219-36. doi: 10.1007/s12029-015-9739-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, the standard management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by resection. Despite the significant improvement in local recurrence, survival benefits are not gained due to distant failure and radiotherapy-associated toxicity. Compliance to adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy is also poor. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone followed by surgery may be an alternative. The objective of this review is to determine the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in operable LARC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic databases searched (from database inception-December 2013) were Medline, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library, and the Clinical Trials Register. Specific journals were also hand searched. The selection criteria were studies published in English investigating stage II-III non-metastatic rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (oral, intravenous or rectal route) followed by curative resection. The primary outcome measure was tumour response. Secondary outcome measures included acute toxicity, operative morbidity, R0 resection, local recurrence, overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

One randomised phase III trial, six single-arm phase II trials and one retrospective case series study were eligible for inclusion. Six studies administered fluoropyrimidine-based multiple agent regimens and two studies administered fluorouracil-based monotherapy. The studies with multiple agents and stronger chemotherapy regimens (intravenous and/or oral) followed by delayed surgery showed better tumour response rates. The overall objective response rate was good and ranged from 62.5 to 93.7 %. Pathological complete response ranged from 3.8 to 33.3 %. The R0 resection and compliance rates were also high ranging from 90 to 100 % and 72 to 100 %, respectively. Grade 3-4 toxicities ranged from 2.3 to 39 %. Four- to 5-year OS and DFS ranged from 67.2 to 91 % and 60.5 to 84 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This review demonstrates that neoadjuvant chemotherapy could be affectively administered in LARC and could provide a good alternative to chemoradiotherapy in moderate-risk rectal cancers without compromising short- and long-term outcomes.

摘要

背景

目前,局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的标准治疗是新辅助放化疗后行手术切除。尽管局部复发率显著改善,但由于远处转移失败和放疗相关毒性,并未获得生存获益。术前放化疗后辅助化疗的依从性也较差。单纯新辅助化疗后行手术可能是一种替代方案。本综述的目的是确定单纯新辅助化疗在可切除LARC中的疗效。

材料与方法

检索的电子数据库(从数据库建立至2013年12月)包括Medline、PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆和临床试验注册库。还手工检索了特定期刊。选择标准为以英文发表的研究,调查接受新辅助化疗(口服、静脉或直肠途径)后行根治性切除的II - III期非转移性直肠癌患者。主要结局指标为肿瘤反应。次要结局指标包括急性毒性、手术并发症、R0切除、局部复发、总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。

结果

一项随机III期试验、六项单臂II期试验和一项回顾性病例系列研究符合纳入标准。六项研究采用基于氟嘧啶的多药方案,两项研究采用基于氟尿嘧啶的单药治疗。采用多药且更强化疗方案(静脉和/或口服)并延迟手术的研究显示出更好的肿瘤反应率。总体客观反应率良好,范围为62.5%至93.7%。病理完全缓解率范围为3.8%至33.3%。R0切除率和依从率也较高,分别为90%至100%和72%至100%。3 - 4级毒性范围为2.3%至39%。4至5年的OS和DFS分别为67.2%至91%和60.5%至84%。

结论

本综述表明,新辅助化疗可有效应用于LARC,并且在不影响短期和长期结局的情况下,可为中度风险直肠癌的放化疗提供良好替代方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验