• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受机械通气的成年患者气管内吸痰的临床指标

Clinical Indicators for Endotracheal Suctioning in Adult Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.

作者信息

Sole Mary Lou, Bennett Melody, Ashworth Suzanne

机构信息

Mary Lou Sole is Orlando Health Distinguished Professor and Pegasus Professor, University of Central Florida, College of Nursing, Orlando, Florida, and a research scientist at Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida. Melody Bennett is a member of the adjunct faculty at the University of Central Florida and a clinical research coordinator at Orlando Health. Suzanne Ashworth is a clinical nurse specialist in neurological critical care at Orlando Regional Medical Center, Orlando, Florida.

出版信息

Am J Crit Care. 2015 Jul;24(4):318-24; quiz 325. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015794.

DOI:10.4037/ajcc2015794
PMID:26134331
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients who need mechanical ventilation require endotracheal suctioning. Guidelines recommend coarse crackles over the trachea and/or the presence of a sawtooth pattern on the flow-volume loop of the ventilator waveform as the best indicators.

OBJECTIVE

To determine clinical cues for endotracheal suctioning in patients who require mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

A descriptive study of 42 adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation. After baseline endotracheal suctioning with a closed-system device, patients were assessed hourly up to 4 hours for guideline-based cues for endotracheal suctioning and lung sounds were auscultated. Endotracheal suctioning was done when cues were detected or 4 hours after baseline suctioning. Secretions were collected, measured, and weighed.

RESULTS

Most patients were male (62%) and white (93%). Mean age was 51 years, and mean duration of mechanical ventilation was 7.5 days. The median time to endotracheal suctioning was 2 hours, and a mean of 4.4 mL of secretions was removed. Three patients had no cues identified but had 1.0 mL or more of secretions. The most frequent cues were crackles over the trachea (88%), sawtooth waveform (33%), coughing (29%), and visible secretions (5%). Cues resolved and physiological parameters improved after suctioning. Coarse lung sounds did not improve.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving mechanical ventilation should be routinely assessed for coarse crackles over the trachea, the most common indicator for endotracheal suctioning. Despite common practice, assessment of lung sounds to identify the need for suctioning is not supported.

摘要

背景

需要机械通气的重症患者需要进行气管内吸痰。指南推荐气管上方出现粗湿啰音和/或呼吸机波形流量-容积环上出现锯齿样波形作为最佳指标。

目的

确定需要机械通气患者气管内吸痰的临床线索。

方法

对42例接受机械通气的成年患者进行描述性研究。使用密闭系统装置进行基线气管内吸痰后,每小时对患者进行评估,持续4小时,以寻找基于指南的气管内吸痰线索,并听诊肺部声音。当检测到线索或在基线吸痰后4小时进行气管内吸痰。收集、测量并称重分泌物。

结果

大多数患者为男性(62%),白人(93%)。平均年龄为51岁,机械通气平均持续时间为7.5天。气管内吸痰的中位时间为2小时,平均吸出分泌物4.4 mL。3例患者未发现线索,但有1.0 mL或更多分泌物。最常见的线索是气管上方的湿啰音(88%)、锯齿样波形(33%)、咳嗽(29%)和可见分泌物(5%)。吸痰后线索消失,生理参数改善。粗啰音未改善。

结论

接受机械通气的患者应常规评估气管上方的粗湿啰音,这是气管内吸痰最常见的指标。尽管这是常见做法,但通过听诊肺部声音来确定是否需要吸痰并无依据。

相似文献

1
Clinical Indicators for Endotracheal Suctioning in Adult Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation.接受机械通气的成年患者气管内吸痰的临床指标
Am J Crit Care. 2015 Jul;24(4):318-24; quiz 325. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015794.
2
Bedside detection of retained tracheobronchial secretions in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: is it time for tracheal suctioning?机械通气患者气管支气管分泌物潴留的床旁检测:是时候进行气管吸痰了吗?
Chest. 2000 Oct;118(4):1095-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.4.1095.
3
Using Endotracheal Suctioning For Patients.对患者使用气管内吸痰法。
Am J Crit Care. 2015 Jul;24(4):326. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015597.
4
A comparison of two airway suctioning frequencies in mechanically ventilated, very-low-birthweight infants.机械通气的极低出生体重儿两种气道吸引频率的比较。
Respir Care. 2001 Aug;46(8):783-8.
5
Physiologic impact of closed-system endotracheal suctioning in spontaneously breathing patients receiving mechanical ventilation.在接受机械通气的自主呼吸患者中,密闭式气管内吸痰的生理影响。
Respir Care. 2009 Mar;54(3):367-74.
6
Investigation into the effect of closed-system suctioning on the frequency of pediatric ventilator-associated pneumonia in a developing country.在发展中国家,调查封闭式吸引对小儿呼吸机相关性肺炎发生率的影响。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;13(1):e25-32. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31820ac0a2.
7
Effects of endotracheal suctioning on mixed venous oxygen saturation and heart rate in critically ill adults.气管内吸痰对危重症成年患者混合静脉血氧饱和度及心率的影响
Heart Lung. 1990 Sep;19(5 Pt 2):552-7.
8
The effects of music therapy in endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated patients.音乐疗法对机械通气患者气管内吸痰的影响。
Nurs Crit Care. 2016 Jan;21(1):44-52. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12159. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
9
Effect of applying positive pressure with or without endotracheal suctioning during extubation: a laboratory study.拔管期间应用正压通气联合或不联合气管内吸痰的效果:一项实验室研究
Respir Care. 2014 Dec;59(12):1905-11. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03121. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
10
Decreasing the adverse effects of endotracheal suctioning during mechanical ventilation by changing practice.通过改变操作方式来减少机械通气时经气管吸引的不良影响。
Respir Care. 2013 Oct;58(10):1588-97. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02265. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Nursing Process Related to the Nursing Focus "Airway Clearance": A Scoping Review.与护理重点“气道清理”相关的护理程序:一项范围综述
Nurs Rep. 2024 Jul 31;14(3):1871-1896. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14030140.
2
Nursing Practice of Airway Care Interventions and Prone Positioning in ICU Patients with COVID-19-A Dutch National Survey.荷兰全国性调查:COVID-19 重症监护病房患者气道护理干预与俯卧位通气的护理实践
J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 29;13(7):1983. doi: 10.3390/jcm13071983.
3
Audit on Practices of Endotracheal Suctioning in Intensive Care Unit Patients among Health Care Workers (HCWs).
针对医护人员对重症监护病房患者进行气管内吸痰操作的审计。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan;28(1):58-65. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24615.
4
Artificial Airway Suctioning: A Systematic Review.人工气道吸痰:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Jul 27;15(7):e42579. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42579. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Airway Mucus in Invasively Ventilated Critically Ill Patients.有创通气的危重症患者的气道黏液
Respir Care. 2023 Sep;68(9):1258-1261. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10628. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
6
Investigation of the airway management practice of emergency department ward nurses: a nationwide survey in China.调查中国急诊科病房护士的气道管理实践:全国性调查。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 17;11(12):e049869. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049869.
7
Predictors of post-extubation stridor in patients on mechanical ventilation: a prospective observational study.机械通气患者拔管后喘鸣的预测因素:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 7;11(1):19993. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99501-8.
8
Intensive care nurses' knowledge and practice of evidence-based recommendations for endotracheal suctioning: a multisite cross-sectional study in Changsha, China.重症监护护士对气管内吸痰循证推荐的知识与实践:中国长沙的一项多中心横断面研究
BMC Nurs. 2021 Oct 4;20(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00715-y.
9
The use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in invasively ventilated critically ill adults: a scoping review protocol.机械通气危重症成人中使用机械通气-呼气末正压通气:范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 8;9(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01547-8.
10
Nursing oral suction intervention to reduce aspiration and ventilator events (NO-ASPIRATE): A randomized clinical trial.护理口腔吸痰干预以减少误吸和呼吸机相关事件(NO-ASPIRATE):一项随机临床试验。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 May;75(5):1108-1118. doi: 10.1111/jan.13920. Epub 2019 Jan 23.