Moore Megan, Robinson Gabrielle, Mink Richard, Hudson Kimberly, Dotolo Danae, Gooding Tracy, Ramirez Alma, Zatzick Douglas, Giordano Jessica, Crawley Deborah, Vavilala Monica S
1Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 2School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 3Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 4Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA. 5Los Angeles BioMedical Research Institute, Torrance, CA. 6Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA. 7Brain Injury Alliance of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct;16(8):758-65. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000494.
This study examined the family experience of critical care after pediatric traumatic brain injury in order to develop a model of specific factors associated with family-centered care.
Qualitative methods with semi-structured interviews were used.
Two level 1 trauma centers.
Fifteen mothers of children who had an acute hospital stay after traumatic brain injury within the last 5 years were interviewed about their experience of critical care and discharge planning. Participants who were primarily English, Spanish, or Cantonese speaking were included.
None.
Content analysis was used to code the transcribed interviews and develop the family-centered care model. Three major themes emerged: 1) thorough, timely, compassionate communication, 2) capacity building for families, providers, and facilities, and 3) coordination of care transitions. Participants reported valuing detailed, frequent communication that set realistic expectations and prepared them for decision making and outcomes. Areas for capacity building included strategies to increase provider cultural humility, parent participation in care, and institutional flexibility. Coordinated care transitions, including continuity of information and maintenance of partnerships with families and care teams, were highlighted. Participants who were not primarily English speaking reported particular difficulty with communication, cultural understanding, and coordinated transitions.
This study presents a family-centered traumatic brain injury care model based on family perspectives. In addition to communication and coordination strategies, the model offers methods to address cultural and structural barriers to meeting the needs of non-English-speaking families. Given the stress experienced by families of children with traumatic brain injury, careful consideration of the model themes identified here may assist in improving overall quality of care to families of hospitalized children with traumatic brain injury.
本研究调查了小儿创伤性脑损伤后重症监护的家庭体验,以建立一个与以家庭为中心的护理相关的特定因素模型。
采用半结构化访谈的定性方法。
两个一级创伤中心。
对过去5年中因创伤性脑损伤而在医院急性住院的儿童的15名母亲进行了访谈,了解她们在重症监护和出院计划方面的经历。纳入了主要说英语、西班牙语或粤语的参与者。
无。
采用内容分析法对转录的访谈进行编码,并建立以家庭为中心的护理模型。出现了三个主要主题:1)全面、及时、富有同情心的沟通;2)家庭、医护人员和医疗机构的能力建设;3)护理过渡的协调。参与者表示重视详细、频繁的沟通,这种沟通能设定现实的期望,并让他们为决策和结果做好准备。能力建设领域包括提高医护人员文化谦逊度、家长参与护理以及机构灵活性的策略。强调了协调护理过渡,包括信息的连续性以及与家庭和护理团队保持伙伴关系。非主要说英语的参与者表示在沟通、文化理解和协调过渡方面特别困难。
本研究基于家庭视角提出了一个以家庭为中心的创伤性脑损伤护理模型。除了沟通和协调策略外,该模型还提供了应对文化和结构障碍的方法,以满足非英语家庭的需求。鉴于创伤性脑损伤儿童家庭所经历的压力,仔细考虑此处确定的模型主题可能有助于提高对住院创伤性脑损伤儿童家庭的整体护理质量。