Suppr超能文献

消费者明智选择中的个体差异:认知反思与数字运算技能的作用。

Individual differences in competent consumer choice: the role of cognitive reflection and numeracy skills.

作者信息

Graffeo Michele, Polonio Luca, Bonini Nicolao

机构信息

Department of Information Engineering and Computer Science, University of Trento Trento, Italy.

Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento Trento, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 17;6:844. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00844. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate whether cognitive reflection and numeracy skills affect the quality of the consumers' decision-making process in a purchase decision context. In a first (field) experiment, an identical product was on sale in two shops with different initial prices and discounts. One of the two deals was better than the other and the consumers were asked to choose the best one and to describe which arithmetic operations they used to solve the problem; then they were asked to complete the numeracy scale (Lipkus et al., 2001). The choice procedures used by the consumers were classified as "complete decision approach" when all the arithmetic operations needed to solve the problem were computed, and as "partial decision approach" when only some operations were computed. A mediation model shows that higher numeracy is associated with use of the complete decision approach. In turn, this approach is positively associated with the quality of the purchase decision. Given that these findings highlight the importance of the decision processes, in a second (laboratory) experiment we used a supplementary method to study the type of information search used by the participants: eye-tracking. In this experiment the participants were presented with decision problems similar to those used in Experiment 1 and they completed the Lipkus numeracy scale and the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT; Frederick, 2005). Participants with a high CRT score chose the best deal more frequently, and showed a more profound and detailed information search pattern compared to participants with a low CRT score. Overall, results indicate that higher levels of cognitive reflection and numeracy skills predict the use of a more thorough decision process (measured with two different techniques: retrospective verbal reports and eye movements). In both experiments the decision process is a crucial factor which greatly affects the quality of the purchase decision.

摘要

在本文中,我们研究了认知反思和计算能力是否会在购买决策情境中影响消费者决策过程的质量。在第一个(实地)实验中,同一款产品在两家商店销售,初始价格和折扣不同。其中一种交易比另一种更好,要求消费者选择最佳交易,并描述他们用来解决问题的算术运算;然后要求他们完成计算能力量表(利普库斯等人,2001年)。当计算出解决问题所需的所有算术运算时,消费者使用的选择程序被归类为“完整决策方法”,而当只计算了一些运算时,则归类为“部分决策方法”。一个中介模型表明,较高的计算能力与使用完整决策方法相关。反过来,这种方法与购买决策的质量呈正相关。鉴于这些发现突出了决策过程的重要性,在第二个(实验室)实验中,我们使用了一种补充方法来研究参与者使用的信息搜索类型:眼动追踪。在这个实验中,向参与者呈现与实验1中使用的类似的决策问题,他们完成了利普库斯计算能力量表和认知反思测试(CRT;弗雷德里克,2005年)。与CRT得分低的参与者相比,CRT得分高的参与者更频繁地选择最佳交易,并表现出更深入、更详细的信息搜索模式。总体而言,结果表明,较高水平的认知反思和计算能力预示着会使用更彻底的决策过程(用两种不同技术衡量:回顾性口头报告和眼动)。在两个实验中,决策过程都是一个关键因素,极大地影响着购买决策的质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3d1/4469827/a631c9d0146d/fpsyg-06-00844-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验