Tangerding Clemens
Med Ges Gesch. 2015;33:65-90.
This essay tries to show that, in the Berlin of the Weimar Republic, Protestant hospitals were built not only to relieve the suffering of the population, but also out of a sense of inferiority to a reinvigorated Catholicism. Hospitals were consequently not only places of care and healing but also of denominational self-assertion. Based on Olaf Blaschke's thesis of a "second denominational age," this contribution tries to demonstrate that the responsible Protestant agents did not make anti-Catholic proclamations at every occasion and in all the media. The founders of the "Protestant Hospital Building Association," which this essay investigates, made deliberate use of anti-Catholic resentment, expressing it boldly when approaching the Protestant elites, while playing it down deliberately when addressing the people of Berlin. With a view to the severe economic crisis and mass unemployment prevailing from 1930, they justified the building of new hospitals with the need to create work places, without making recourse to the denomination argument. The political situation, the addressees and the hope for economic success seem to have informed the representation of denominational resentments decisively. Confessionalism therefore seemed to have been not as much a question of ideology as one of strategy.
本文试图表明,在魏玛共和国时期的柏林,新教医院的建立不仅是为了减轻民众的痛苦,也是出于对复兴的天主教的自卑感。因此,医院不仅是护理和治疗的场所,也是教派自我肯定的场所。基于奥拉夫·布拉斯克的“第二个教派时代”的论点,本文试图证明,负责的新教机构并非在任何场合和所有媒体上都发表反天主教的声明。本文所研究的“新教医院建设协会”的创始人蓄意利用反天主教情绪,在接近新教精英时大胆表达,而在面对柏林民众时则刻意淡化。鉴于1930年以来严重的经济危机和大规模失业,他们以创造工作岗位的必要性为由为建造新医院辩护,而没有诉诸教派论据。政治局势、受众以及对经济成功的期望似乎在很大程度上决定了教派怨恨的表达方式。因此,教派主义似乎与其说是一个意识形态问题,不如说是一个策略问题。