Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur Urol. 2015 Nov;68(5):814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
Men with prostate cancer on active surveillance (AS) are advised to follow strict follow-up schedules and switch to definitive treatment on risk reclassification. However, some men might not adhere to these strict protocols.
To determine the number of noncompliers and disease reclassification rates in men not complying with the follow-up protocol of the Prostate Cancer Research International Active Surveillance (PRIAS) study.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4547 men with low-risk prostate cancer were included and prospectively followed on AS. Men were regularly examined using prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination, and repeat biopsies, and were advised to switch to definitive treatment on disease reclassification (>cT2c, Gleason score > 3+3, >2 cores positive, or PSA doubling time [PSA-DT] 0-3 yr).
Rates of men not complying with follow-up visits or a recommendation to discontinue AS are reported. Biopsy outcome (Gleason ≥7 or >2 cores positive) was compared between compliers and noncompliers using Cox proportional hazards analysis.
The compliance rate for PSA visits was 91%. By contrast, the compliance rate for standard repeat biopsies decreased over time (81%, 60%, 53%, and 33% at 1, 4, 7, and 10 yr after diagnosis, respectively). Yearly repeat biopsies in men with faster rising PSA (PSA-DT 3-10 yr) was low at <30%, although these men had higher upgrading rates at repeat biopsy (25-30% vs 16%). PSA-DT of 0-3 yr was the most common recommendation for discontinuation, but 71% continued on AS. Men with PSA-DT of 0-3 yr were at higher risk of upgrading on repeat biopsy (hazard ratio 2.02, 95% confidence interval 1.36-3.00) compared to men without fast rising PSA.
Some men and their physicians do not comply with AS follow-up protocols. In particular, yearly repeat biopsies in men with fast rising PSA are often ignored, as is the recommendation to discontinue AS because of very fast rising PSA. Although these men are at greater risk of higher Gleason scores on repeat biopsy, the majority still exhibit favorable tumor characteristics. Fast rising PSA should therefore not trigger a recommendation to receive active treatment, but should rather serve as a criterion for stricter follow-up. In addition, we should aim to find ways of safely reducing the number of biopsies to increase adherence to AS protocols.
We looked at compliance with an active surveillance protocol for low-risk prostate cancer in a large active surveillance study. We observed reluctance to undergo yearly biopsies because of fast rising prostate-specific antigen, despite a higher risk of disease progression. Further research should aim to safely reduce the number of repeat biopsies in men on active surveillance to increase protocol adherence.
建议接受主动监测(AS)的前列腺癌男性遵循严格的随访计划,并在风险重新分类时转为确定性治疗。然而,有些男性可能无法遵守这些严格的方案。
确定不符合前列腺癌研究国际主动监测(PRIAS)研究随访方案的男性中的不依从者数量和疾病重新分类率。
设计、地点和参与者:共纳入 4547 名患有低危前列腺癌的男性,并前瞻性地接受 AS 随访。男性定期接受前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、直肠指检和重复活检检查,并建议在疾病重新分类时(>cT2c、Gleason 评分>3+3、>2 个核心阳性或 PSA 倍增时间[PSA-DT]0-3 年)转为确定性治疗。
报告未遵守随访就诊或停止 AS 建议的男性比例。使用 Cox 比例风险分析比较依从者和不依从者的活检结果(Gleason≥7 或>2 个核心阳性)。
PSA 就诊的依从率为 91%。相比之下,标准重复活检的依从率随时间推移而降低(诊断后 1、4、7 和 10 年时分别为 81%、60%、53%和 33%)。PSA-DT 为 3-10 年的男性中,每年重复进行 PSA 活检的比例较低(<30%),尽管这些男性的重复活检升级率较高(25-30%比 16%)。PSA-DT 为 0-3 年是最常见的停止 AS 建议,但仍有 71%的患者继续接受 AS。PSA-DT 为 0-3 年的男性在重复活检时发生升级的风险更高(危险比 2.02,95%置信区间 1.36-3.00),高于 PSA 无快速升高的患者。
一些男性及其医生不遵守 AS 随访方案。特别是,PSA 快速升高的男性通常忽略每年重复进行的活检,也不遵守因 PSA 快速升高而停止 AS 的建议。尽管这些男性在重复活检时出现更高 Gleason 评分的风险更高,但大多数患者仍表现出有利的肿瘤特征。快速升高的 PSA 不应引发接受积极治疗的建议,而应作为加强随访的标准。此外,我们应该努力寻找安全减少活检次数的方法,以提高对 AS 方案的依从性。
我们研究了在一项大型主动监测研究中,低危前列腺癌患者对主动监测方案的依从性。我们观察到,尽管疾病进展风险较高,但由于 PSA 快速升高,人们不愿意接受每年的活检。进一步的研究应旨在安全减少接受主动监测男性的重复活检次数,以提高方案的依从性。