Comparison of two arbitrary cast transfer systems with a kinematic facebow for mounting a maxillary cast on a semiadjustable articulator.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The Kois Dento-Facial Analyzer (KDFA) is used by clinicians to mount maxillary casts and to evaluate and treat patients. Limited information is available for understanding whether the KDFA should be considered as an alternative to an arbitrary facebow.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate and compare maxillary casts mounted by using the KDFA with casts mounted by using the Panadent Pana-Mount Facebow (PMF) and a kinematic axis (KA) facebow.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifteen participants were enrolled in the study. Three maxillary impressions were made of each study participant. One cast from each study participant was mounted on an articulator by means of the KDFA, PMF, and KA. A standardized photograph of each mounting was made, and the condylar center-incisor distance and the occlusal and incisal plane angles were measured. A randomized complete block design analysis of variance (RCBD) (α=.05) and post hoc tests (Tukey-Kramer HSD) were used to evaluate the occlusal and incisal plane angles and the condylar center-incisor distance.

RESULTS

Compared with the occlusal plane angle (OPA), the KDFA mounted the maxillary cast at an angle that was statistically lower than those of PMF and KA (P<.001). The KDFA and the PMF condylar center-incisor distances were both significantly greater than that of KA (P=.01). No differences were found between the incisal plane angle (IPA) on maxillary casts mounted with the KDFA, KA, or PMF (P=.16).

CONCLUSIONS

The KDFA and PMF mounted the maxillary casts in a position that was farther from the axis when compared with the KA mounted casts. The KDFA resulted in a lower articulator OPA compared with both PMF and KA. No difference was found between the IPAs of the KDFA, PMF, and KA.